Why Government Policies Can’t Be Optimization in Providing Housing for Low-Income Communities?

Authors

  • Mendra Wijaya Universitas Islam Riau
  • Zanariah Zanariah Kementerian Dalam Negeri, Jakarta
  • Tengku Fahrul Gafar Program Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Universitas Abdurrab, Pekanbaru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jgop.v5i2.17484

Keywords:

Housing Policy, Low-Income Community, Backlog

Abstract

The government in Indonesia makes various policies to handle the issue of low income communicties (MBR) housing and reduce backlog. The implementation of housing and residential area plicies should yield better results. The authority of MBR housing affairs is also not distributed to local government, and there are overlapping policies between Law Number 23 of 2014 about regional government and Law Number 1 of 2011 about housing and residential areas. This study implements a qualitative method by using a descriptive approach that analyzes data and documents from central government agencies that carry out governement affairs concerning housing and residential areas in Indonesia and other related agencies. The results of the study show that central government cannot stand alone in housing development for low-income communities because the distribution of authority to local governments is not good. The government needs contributions from the private sector. Suppose development is handed over to the housing and residential private sectors. The contruction of housing in MBR, which has become the state’s responsibility to meet its citizens’ basic needs, will change to a business orientation, even though the government is encouraging to provide various subsidies and financing mechanisms. One of the programs from the government is FLPP, which stands for Housing Finance Liquidity Facility. The program encourages housing finance to support low-income communities. Then, proceed with the specific housing program called the One Million Houses Program, which can reduce the backlog in residential construction. The program will proceed with the Public-Private Partnership (PPP) model, which ultimately involves the private sector in developing MBR. The implication of this study is that the implementation of government affairs concerning housing and settlement areas, especially the development of housing for MBR, is fundamentally a mandatory basic service affair, a concept inconsistent with its implementation.

References

Abidoye, R. B., Puspitasari, G., Sunindijo, R., & Adabre, M. (2021). Young adults and homeownership in Jakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 14(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-03-2020-0030

Anacker, K. B. (2019). Introduction: Housing Affordability and Affordable Housing. International Journal of Housing Policy, 19(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2018.1560544

Boelhouwer, P. (2020). The housing market in The Netherlands as a driver for social inequalities: proposals for reform. International Journal of Housing Policy, 20(3), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1663056

Bohnenberger, K. (2021). Can ‘Sufficiency’ reconcile social and environmental goals? A Q-methodological analysis of German housing policy. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09762-4

Chien, M. S., & Setyowati, N. (2021). The effects of uncertainty shocks on global housing markets. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 14(1), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-03-2020-0020

Das, A. (2021). Public Housing in the Global Cities: Hong Kong and Singapore at the Crossroads. Urban and Regional Planning, 6(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.urp.20210601.14

Fuster-Farfán, X. (2021). Exception as a government strategy: contemporary Chile’s housing policy. International Journal of Housing Policy, 0(0), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2021.1910784

Gonzalez, L., Lima-Silva, F., & Pozzebon, M. (2021). Improving public housing policies that target low-income households: The value of adding proximity to discretion. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 39(7), 1567–1585. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544211041119

Gusakova, N., Gusakov, A., Prokhorova, Y., & Karakozova, I. (2023). Creation of Programs for Sustainable Administration of Low-Rise Housing Construction Programs in Remote Areas With Special Climatic Conditions. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.264

Haycox, H. (2023). Policy paradoxes and the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme: How welfare policies impact resettlement support. Critical Social Policy, 43(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221088532

Heylen, K. (2020). Targeted affordable housing subsidies in Flanders: evaluating equity using equivalence scales. International Journal of Housing Policy, 20(4), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2019.1608114

Hudson, B., Hunter, D., & Peckham, S. (2019). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378

Indradjati, P. N. (2020). Peraturan Zonasi Sebagai Perangkat Kolaboratif Mewujudkan Perumahan untuk Masyarakat Berpendapatan Rendah Di Kawasan Perkotaan. Jurnal Permukiman, 15(2), 61. https://doi.org/10.31815/jp.2020.15.61-72

Jibril, M., & Maretta, A. G. (2019). Transfer Control of Public Housing Ownership in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 10(01), 23–33. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v10i1.a13624

Josiah Omotosho, A., Abidemi Kosoko, R., & Anthony Adenaike, F. (2020). Improving Affordable Housing Delivery Through Private Developers in Lagos State. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 4(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20200403.12

Kamaruzzaman, S. N., Razali, A., Zawawi, E. M. A., & Riley, M. (2018). The Effects of Indoor Environment towards Middle–Income Group in Re-engineered Affordable Housing Scheme in Malaysia. Journal of Design and Built Environment, 1, 88–101. https://doi.org/10.22452/jdbe.sp2018no1.8

Liu, Z., Guo, J., Zhong, W., & Gui, T. (2021). Multi-Level Governance, Policy Coordination and Subnational Responses to COVID-19: Comparing China and the US. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 23(2), 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2021.1873703

Marchesi, M., & Tweed, C. (2021). Social innovation for a circular economy in social housing. Sustainable Cities and Society, 71(April), 102925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102925

Mayboroda, V., & Spirin, P. (2023). Legal Regulation in the Field of Territorial Planning and Urban Zoning: Main Problems and Ways To Solve Them. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.37497/sdgs.v11i1.254

Odoyi, E. J., & Riekkinen, K. (2022). Housing Policy: An Analysis of Public Housing Policy Strategies for Low-Income Earners in Nigeria. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042258

Park, H. J., & Choi, K. (2021). Affordable housing program tenants and their access to public transportation and employment. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 36(3), 1119–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-020-09796-8

Ryan-Collins, J. (2021). Breaking the housing–finance cycle: Macroeconomic policy reforms for more affordable homes. Environment and Planning A, 53(3), 480–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19862811

Shoesmith, D., Franklin, N., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Decentralised Governance in Indonesia’s Disadvantaged Regions: A Critique of the Underperforming Model of Local Governance in Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 39(3), 359–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103420963140

Sulaiman, F. C., Hasan, R., & Jamaluddin, E. R. (2016). Users Perception of Public Low Income Housing Management in Kuala Lumpur. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 326–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.249

Sunarti, S., Syahbana, J. A., & Manaf, A. (2019). Space transformation in a low-income housing community in Danukusuman, Surakarta. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 12(2), 265–280. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHMA-03-2018-0020

Wardana, D., Ismail, S., Wijaya, M., Riau, U. I., City, P., Province, R., Kedah, S., & Aman, D. (2023). HOUSING POLICY DYNAMICS : CAN THE GOVERNMENT MEET HOUSING NEEDS FOR LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES ? Cosmogov : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v9i1.44779

Wetzstein, S. (2021). Toward Affordable Cities? Critically Exploring the Market-Based Housing Supply Policy Proposition. Housing Policy Debate, 00(00), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2021.1871932

Wijaya, M., & Handrisal, H. (2021). Kebijakan Penyelenggaraan Perumahan Masyarakat Berpenghasilan Rendah di Kabupaten Lahat Provinsi Sumatera Selatan. KEMUDI : Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 6(01), 37–51. https://doi.org/10.31629/kemudi.v6i01.3579

Wijaya, M., Zanariah, Rosalin, N., Yulina, I. K., Dinihari, T. R., Purba, T. P., Ernamayanti, & Saragih, J. (2023). Dinamika Kebijakan dan Praktik Penyelenggaraan Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman. Madza Publishing.

Wu, Y., Su, B., & Li, J. (2023). The Impact of Low Fertility Rates on Labor Demand and Socioeconomic Development in China. Perspectives, 5(27), 599–604. https://doi.org/10.46234/ccdcw2023.115

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

Issue

Section

Articles