SMART CAMPUS INDONESIA BERDASARKAN SOCIETY 5.0 JEPANG DAN SMART EDUCATION KOREA

Authors

  • Stefani Made Ayu Universitas Terbuka
  • Gunawan Wiradharma Universitas Terbuka
  • Khaerul Anam Universitas Terbuka
  • Arina Rubyasih Universitas Terbuka
  • Karina Pramita Ningrum Universitas Pakuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v14i4.17066

Keywords:

Smart Campus, Smart Education, Society 5.0

Abstract

Abstrak: Penerapan smart campus diharapkan mampu menciptakan pendidikan yang kekinian dan mampu mengantarkan SDM menjadi manusia yang terdidik. Untuk menciptakan smart campus tersebut, diperlukan suatu model yang akan menjadi pedoman atau patokan bagi suatu perguruan tinggi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mendapatkan gambaran pengembangan Smart Campus di Indonesia yang diketahui dari strategi smart education yang diterapkan di Korea dan society 5.0 yang diterapkan di Jepang melalui komparasi keterkaitan antara society 5.0 dengan Smart Education serta SDGs sebagai data tambahan dalam menyusun peran dan strategi perguruan tinggi. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Pengambilan data dilakukan dengan wawancara kepada narasumber yang pernah atau sedang studi di Jepang/Korea. Model smart campus di Jepang yang menerapkan Society 5.0 menekankan pada teknologi yang berujung pada kemandirian dalam belajar. Model smart campus di Korea Selatan menekankan pada teknologi yang berujung pada kemudahan dalam mengakses konten-konten pembelajaran. Sistem teknologi yang terintegrasi membuat proses perkuliahan menjadi nyaman, efektif, dan efesien. Perguruan tinggi di Indonesia mulai menerapkan sistem berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam lingkungan kampus karena didorong dari seluruh civitas akademik di perguruan tinggi yang mengharapkan kenyamanan sehingga pentingnya peranan teknologi.Pengembangan konsep smart campus perlu dilakukan dengan penyesuaian terhadap culture di Indonesia agar nantinya saat konsep tersebut diterapkan secara masif dapat berjalan dengan hasil yang sesuai dan dapat membantu mempermudah penyelenggaraan pendidikan di perguruan tinggi.

Abstract: The implementation of the smart campus, it is hoped that it will be able to create up-to-date education and be able to deliver human resources to become educated human beings. To create a smart campus, we need a model that will become a guideline or benchmark for a university. The aim of this research is to get an overview of Smart Campus development in Indonesia which is known from the smart education strategy implemented in Korea and society 5.0 implemented in Japan through a comparison of the relationship between society 5.0 and Smart Education and SDGs as additional data in formulating the role and strategy of higher education. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a case study method. Data collection was carried out by conducting interviews with informants who had or are currently studying in Japan/Korea. The smart campus model in Japan that implements Society 5.0 emphasizes technology which leads to independence in learning. The smart campus model in South Korea emphasizes technology, resulting in easy access to learning content. An integrated technology system makes the lecture process comfortable, effective, and efficient. Universities in Indonesia are starting to implement information and communication technology-based systems in the campus environment because they are encouraged by the entire academic community in tertiary institutions who expect comfort, so the important role of technology is important. The development of the smart campus concept needs to be carried out with adjustments to the culture in Indonesia so that when the concept is implemented on a massive scale it can run with appropriate results and can help facilitate the implementation of education in higher education.

References

Alimuddin, Z. (2019). Menyiapkan Pendidik Profesional di Era Society 5.0. Ditpsd.Kemendikbud. http://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/artikel/detail/menyiapkan-pendidik-profesional-di-era-society-50

Arifin, I. (2019). Kepemimpinan Religio-Humanistik Bidang Pendidikan pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Society 5.0.

Arjunaita. (2020). Pendidikan di era revolusi industri 5.0. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas PGRI Palembang, 179–196.

Atif, Y.; Mathew, S.S.; Lakas, A. (2015). Building a smart campus to support ubiquitous learning. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput., 6, 223–238.

Bătăgan, L. & Boja, C. (2012). Smart solutions for educational systems - case study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4834 – 4838.

Budhrani, Kiran, Yaeeun Ji, & J. H. L. (2018). Unpacking Conceptual Elements of Smart Learning in the Korean Scholarly Discourse. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1).

Chen, Z., Liu, Y. (2021). Research and Construction of University Data Governance Platform Based on Smart Campus Environment. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Manufacture, 450–455.

CIS (Council on Informatization Strategies) & MEST (Ministry of Education, S. and T. (2011). Smart Education Strategies.

Cordiaz, M. (2017). Penerapan Smart Campus sebagai Pendukung Kegiatan Pendidikan dalam Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Informatika Universitas Pamulang, 2(2), 77. https://doi.org/10.32493/informatika.v2i2.1508

Frydenberg, M., & Andone, D. (2011). Learning for 21st century skills. International Conference on Information Society (ISociety 2011), 314–318.

Gunawan. (2013a). Tinjauan sicio-multicultural-art-reality-technology SMART.

Gunawan, A. (2013b). Tinjauan socio-multicultural-art-reality-technology “SMART.â€

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications.

Kahar, M. I., Cika, H., Nur Afni, & Nur Eka Wahyuningsih. (2021). Pendidikan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 Menuju Era Society 5.0 Di Masa Pandemi Covid 19. Moderasi: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 2(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.24239/moderasi.vol2.iss1.40

Kim, T., Cho, JY & Lee, B. G. (2012). Evolution to smart learning in public education A case study of Korean public education. Korea Communications Agency.

Kim, D. (2012). Evolution to smart learning in public education: A case study of Korean public education. Korea Communication Agency.

Lubis, A. H. (2018). ICT Usage Amongst Lecturers and Its Impact Towards Learning Process Quality (Vol. 34, Issue 1).

MEST (Ministry of Education, S. and T. (2011). Implementation Plans for SMART Education Strategies.

Moleong, L. J. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Rev. Ed.). Remaja Rosda Karya.

Moodle. (2018). Moodle. https://docs.moodle.org/35/en/Features

Muhamad, W., Kurniawan, N.B., Suhardi, Yazid, S. (2017). Smart campus features, technologies, and applications: A systematic literature review. Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Technology Systems and Innovation (ICITSI), 384–391.

Muniqar N, G. (2019). Smart City Sebagai Kontribusi Jepang Dalam Masalah Perubahan Iklim [Universitas Jember]. https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/89983

Nasro, M.-A., Saleh, A. (2020). Smart campus—A sketch. Sustain. Cities Soc., 59, 102231.

Pardo, N. &. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In The Proceedings Of The 12th Annual Internasional Conference On Digital Goverment. Reserch Center for Technology in Goverment University Albany, State University of New York.

Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Sage Publications.

Peppard, J., J. W. (2004). Beyond strategic information systems: towards an IS capability. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., 13(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2004.02.002

Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.

R. R. Rerung, Y. R. R. (2018). Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Akademik Dalam Penerapan Smart Campus Untuk Meningkatkan Pelayanan Akademik. JTERA (Jurnal Teknol. Rekayasa), 3(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.31544/jtera.v3.i2.2018.191-210

Rothman, R. (2007a). Building “smart education system.†http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/08/01/44rothman.h26.html

Rothman, R. (2007b). Building ‘smart education system.’ http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2007/08/01/44rothman.h26.html

Sadjati, I. M. (2017). Smart Education dan Smart City. In Optimalisasi Peran Sains & Teknologi untu Mewujudkan Smart City (Edisi Kesa, pp. 11–34). Universitas Terbuka.

Schoning, J. (2013). From Smart Cities to Smart Campus Supporting the Campus Citizen. Hasselt University Belgium.

Setiawan, D. (2019). Analisis dan Perancangan Sistem Informasi LENTERA Untuk Membentuk ‘Smart Society’ di Lingkungan Kampus Menggunakan Metode OOAD (Studi Kasus : Universitas PGRI Madiun). 155–159.

Sevima. (2020). Perguruan Tinggi Menghadapi Era Society 5.0. https://sevima.com/perguruan-tinggi-menghadapi-era-society-5-0/

Shahrour, I. (2014). Smart Campus an Effective Concept for the Development of the Smart and Sustainable City. Polytech’Lille France.

Suhardjanto, D. (2017). IAPT BAN PT.

Sutedi, A. (2009). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

UIN Raden Fatah. (2017). Blue Print Sistem Informasi Management.

Uskov, V.L., Bakken, J.P., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. C. (2018). Smart Universities: Concepts, Systems, and Technologies. Springer.

W. Muhamad, N. B. Kurniawan, S. Suhardi, and S. Y. (2017). Smart campus features, technologies, and applications: A systematic literature review. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITSI.2017.8267975

Downloads

Published

2023-10-04

Issue

Section

Articles