KEMAMPUAN MENGKONSTRUKSIKAN TEKS NEGOSIASI DENGAN MEMPERHATIKAN ISI STRUKTUR DAN KEBAHASAAN PADA SISWA KELAS X

Authors

  • Suryani Suryani Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Titin Untari Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram
  • Nurmiwati Nurmiwati Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v9i2.827

Keywords:

Kemampuan Mengkonstruksikan, Teks Negosiasi, Isi Struktur, Kebahasaan

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan kemampuan mengkonstruksikan teks negosiasi dengan memperhatikan isi struktur dan kebahasaan pada siswa kelas X. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian deskriptif kuantitatif dengan subjek penelitian adalah siswa sebanyak 33 orang. Metode pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini yaitu metode observasi, metode tugas, dan metode dokumentasi. Tehnik analisis data menggunakan rumus penilaian acuan patokan (PAP). Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh bahwa kemampuan mengkonstrusikan teks negosiasi dengan memperhatikan isi struktur dan kebahasaan pada siswa tergolong normal, hal ini dikarenakan antara lain kurang persiapan siswa dan guru dalam mengikuti proses belajar mengajar yang digunakan, siswa yang kurang aktif dalam menerima pelajaran. Kemampuan mengkonstruksikan teks negosiasi dengan memperhatikan isi struktur dan kebahasaan oleh siswa yakni (1) Kemampuan induvidual yang terdiri dari (a) kategori tinggi sebanyak 14 siswa atau 42%, (b) kategori sedang sebanyak 19 siswa atau 58%, (c) kategori rendah sebanyak 0 siswa atau 0%; dan (2) IPK sebesar 65,72 pada kategori Normal.

 

Abstract: This study aims to describe the ability to construct negotiating texts by paying attention to the structure and language content of class X students. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative research with 33 research subjects as the subject. The method of data collection in this study is the observation method, task method, and documentation method. Data analysis techniques use the benchmark reference assessment formula (PAP). Based on the results of the study, it was found that the ability to construct negotiating text by paying attention to the contents of the structure and language in students is normal, this is because, among others, students and teachers lack preparation in the teaching and learning process used, students who are less active in receiving lessons. The ability to construct negotiating texts by paying attention to the contents of the structure and language by students namely (1) Individual abilities consisting of (a) high categories as many as 14 students or 42%, (b) moderate categories as many as 19 students or 58%, (c) low categories 0 students or 0%; and (2) GPA of 65.72 in the Normal category.

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian. Jakarta: Penerbit Rinerka CiptaDarma.

Badan Penelitian dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Bahasa Indonesia Ekspresi Diri dan Akademik. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan. (2013). Kurikulum 2013 Kompetensi Dasar SMA/MA. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Eri, S. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Teks Negosiasi Pengalaman Melalui Metode Group Investigation pada Siswa Kelas X MIA 1 SMA Negeri 2 Sukoharjo Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016. Semarang: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Lewicki, Roy J., Bruce B., dan David M. S. (2012). Negosiasi. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Mardalis. (2008). Metode Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Moleong, L. J. (2004). Metode Penelitian, Bandung : Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nurhayati. (2006). Pembelajaran Menulis. Jurnal Ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Peeling, N. (2009). Negosiasi Juara: diterjemahkan oleh Dicky Setyana. Jakarta: Esensi.

Pinangsia, S. (2015). Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Teks Negosiasi dengan Menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah pada Siswa Kelas X Teknik Konstruksi Batu dan Beton SMK Negeri 1 Purworejo. Yogyakarta: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Riyanto. (2001). Metodologi Penelitian Pendididkan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Sutrisno dan Kusmawan R. (2007). Modul Melakukan Negosiasi Bisnis dan Manajemen. Suka Bumi: Yudhis tira.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tampubolon, S. (2014). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas sebagai Pengembangan Profesi Pendidik Dan Keilmuan. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Tarigan, H. G. (2008). Menulis Sebagai Salah Satu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-30

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2018): September

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.

Authors who publish with Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.