Developing and Testing HOTS-Based Evaluation Packages for Metabolism with Science Literacy Skills Aspects

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v6i2.15420

Keywords:

Evaluation, Evaluation Package, Metabolism, HOTS, Science Literacy Skills

Abstract

The purpose of learning evaluation is to measure students' higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and science literacy skills. However, many challenges hinder this process, such as low-level questions, lack of question variety, student dishonesty, and poor reading comprehension and understanding of questions. These factors reduce students' reasoning abilities and learning outcomes. Therefore, this study aims to develop and test the feasibility of an evaluation package that emphasizes HOTS and science literacy skills in the topic of metabolism. Metabolism is a difficult topic for students because it covers a wide range of complex and abstract concepts. This study used the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE model, which was limited to the Development stage. The research stages consisted of needs analysis, design and development, as well as product validation and revision. Data collection was done through interviews and validation questionnaires and analyzed using quantitative and qualitative data. The results of this study were two packages of HOTS questions (A and B) with aspects of science literacy skills, each containing 20 questions with 100% HOTS proportion and five different question formats. The questions were printed on A4 paper and intended to be used as daily test assessments. The results of the validation showed that both packages were "very feasible" with a percentage of 91.6% (Package A) and 92% (Package B). Therefore, the evaluation package developed was suitable for limited testing after revision.

References

Ardelia, N., and Juanengsih, N. (2021). Implementasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 pada Mata Pelajaran Biologi di SMA Negeri Kota Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran Biologi, 2(2), 1-11.

Arifin, Z. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Avina, Y. P. A., and Winarsih. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian sebagai Contoh Paket Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Materi Pencemaran Lingkungan Kelas X SMA. Bioedu, 9(1), 217-222.

Bagus, B., Kusairi, S., and Sutarman. (2016). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Formatif Formal Berbantuan Komputer untuk Membantu Pembelajaran Dinamika Rotasi. Jurnal Tarbiyah (Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan), 5(2), 7-22.

Baidlowi, M. H., Sunarmi, and Sulisetijono. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Essay Tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Materi Struktur Jaringan dan Fungsi Organ pada Tumbuhan Kelas XI SMAN 1 Tumpang. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 10(2), 57–65.

Fanani, M. Z. (2018). Strategi Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) dalam Kurikulum 2013. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 2(1), 57-76.

Fortuna, D., Chandra, E., and Gloria, R. Y. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostic untuk Mengukur Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Regulasi Manusia untuk Siswa SMA Kelas XI Semester II. Jurnal Scientiae Educatia. 2(2).

Hanafi (2017). Konsep Penelitian R&D dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Saintifika Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Keislaman, 4(2), 129-150.

Harta, J. (2017). Pengembangan Soal Esai Berbasis HOTS untuk Menyelidiki Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMA. Jurnal Penelitian, 21(1), 62-69.

Isbandiyah, S., and Sanusi, A. (2019). Modul Penyusunan Soal Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Biologi. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.

Irwandi. (2020). Strategi Pembelajaran Biologi. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.

Lestari T, M., Ramlawati, and Yunus, S. R. (2020). Hubungan antara Keterampilan Proses Sains dengan Hasil Belajar IPA Peserta Didik Kelas VII di SMPN 40 Makassar. Jurnal IPA Terpadu, 3(2), 46-53.

Limbong, T., and Taufik, I. (2017). Aplikasi Pengacak Soal Ujian untuk Type Soal Berbasis Microsoft Word Menggunakan Metode Linear Congruent Method (LCM). MEANS (Media Informasi Analisa dan Sistem), 2(1), 58-65.

Masgumelar, N. K., and Mustafa, P. S. (2021). Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dan Implikasinya dalam Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran. GHAITSA: Islamic Education Journal, 2(1), 49-51.

Muhibbuddin, Ulfa, M., Pada, A. U. T., Rahmatan, H., and Hasanuddin. (2022). The Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Instrument On Metabolism Topic for Senior High School Level. IJAEDU-International EJournal of Advances in Education, 8(23), 118-126.

Musayaroh, T., Yuliana, I. F., and Fatayah, F. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Kimia Berbasis Hots Yang Layak Ditinjau dari Validitas Isi oleh Ahli. UNESA Journal of Chemical Education, 10(3), 243-351.

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Paidi. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Pratiwi, O. (2019). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Web pada Materi Evolusi Kelas XII di SMA Negeri 1 Meulaboh [Unpublished Thesis]. Aceh: Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/293474139.pdf.

Pratiwi, S. A., Syamsiah, S., and Bahri, A. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Literasi Sains pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Biology Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-6.

Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran. (2020). Desain pengembangan soal AKM. Jakarta: Pusat Assesmen dan Pembelajaran Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Ramadhani, R., and Bina, N. R. (2021). Statistika Penelitian Pendidikan: Analisis Perhitungan Matematika. Jakarta: Kencana.

Sasongko, T. P. M., Dafik, and Oktavianingtyas, E. (2016). Pengembangan Paket Soal Model Pisa Konten Space and Shape untuk Mengetahui Level Literasi Matematika Siswa SMP. Jurnal Edukasi, III (1), 27-32.

Schleicher, A. (2018). PISA 2018 Insights and Interpretations. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Septiani, D., Widiyawati, Y., and Nurwahidah, I. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Literasi Sains PISA Aspek Menjelaskan Fenomena Ilmiah Kelas VII. Science Education and Application Journal (SEAJ) Program Studi Pendidikan IPA Universitas Islam Lamongan, 1 (2): 46-55 .

Septikasari, R., and Frasandy, R. N. (2018). Keterampilan 4C Abad 21 dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Tarbiyah Al-Awlad, 8(2), 112-122.

Setiawan, A. R., and Mufassaroh, A. Z. (2019). Menyusun Soal Literasi Saintifik untuk Pembelajaran Biologi Topik Plantae dan Animalia. BIOSFER, J.Bio. & Pend. Bio. 4(1), 33-40.

Setiawati, W., Asmira, O., Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., and Pudjiastuti, A. (2019). Buku Penilaian Berorientasi Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Sugrah, N. (2019). Implementasi Teori Belajar Konstruktivisme dalam Pembelajaran Sains. Humanika. Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 19(2), 121-138.

Thahir, R., Magfirah, N., and Anisa, A. (2021). Hubungan antara High Order Thinking Skills dan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. BIODIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 7(3), 105-113.

Tim Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2019). Panduan Penulisan Soal HOTS-Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan.

Utama, C., and Rahman, A. F. (2020). Kaitan Antara Literasi Sains dan HOTS untuk Pembelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 2, 250-256.

Wasis, Rahayu, Y. S., Sunarti, T., and Indana, S. (2020). HOTS & Literasi Sains: Konsep, Pembelajaran, dan Penilaiannya. Jombang: Kun Fayakun.

Widana, W. I. (2017). Modul Penyusunan Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMA.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-29

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): August

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.

Authors who publish with IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.