Problem-Solving Ability in Learning Islamic Education Philosophy Course through IDEAL Stages

Authors

  • Amrullah Amrullah Islamic Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
  • Meli Fauziah English Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
  • Aini Syahira Jamaluddin Albukhary International University Malaysia
  • Ahmad Bustomi Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Metro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v6i3.19691

Keywords:

Problem-Solving Ability, Islamic Education Philosophy, IDEAL Stages.

Abstract

Islamic education philosophy course cultivates students’ critical thinking skill when they are able to solve problems in learning well. Due to the complexity of the course, students often face some difficulties. The aim of this study is to describe problem-solving ability in learning Islamic Education Philosophy course through IDEAL stages (Identify, Define, Examine, Act, and Look). This study used a quantitative method with a descriptive approach. The data were analysed descriptively using manual mathematic calculation. The results of this study revealed that the IDEAL stages were effectively used for solving problems encountered in learning Islamic Education Philosophy course. From the skill test, 8 students got a score of 100 on the A scale with a percentage of 22% who were able to answer correctly and completely in each IDEAL stage. Besides, there were also 10 students who got a score of 97 on A scale with a percentage of 28% who almost carried out all stages correctly and completely. In addition, there were 7 students who got a score of 94 on the B scale with a percentage of 18% which means incomplete in several stages and there were 14 students who got a score of 91 on the B scale with a percentage of 40% which was still weak in several IDEAL stages.

References

A, H. (2018). Philosophy and the good life. Journal of Philosophy in Schools, Vol. 5 No.

Abazof, R. (2022). How to Improve Your Problem-Solving Skills. 10 May. https://www.topuniversities.com/blog/how-improve-your-problem-solving-skills

Alchihabi, A., Ekmekci, O., Kivilcim, B. B., Newman, S. D., & Yarman Vural, F. T. (2021). Analyzing Complex Problem Solving by Dynamic Brain Networks. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 15(December), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2021.670052

Amanda, F. F., Sumitro, S. B., Lestari, S. R., & Ibrohim. (2022). The Correlation of Critical Thinking and Concept Mastery to Problem-Solving Skills: The Role of Complexity Science-Problem Based Learning Model. Pedagogika, 146(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2022.146.4

Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Rineka Cipta.

Ary, Donald., et al. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education: Eight Edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). 21st Century Skilss Journal. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 1–16.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research Fourth Edition. Pearson Education, Inc.

Doddington, C. (2014). Philosophy, art or pedagogy? How should children experience education? Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 46 (1.

Dörner, D., & Funke, J. (2017). Complex problem solving: What it is and what it is not. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(JUL), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01153

Foster, C. (2023). Problem solving in the mathematics curriculum: From domain-general strategies to domain-specific tactics. Curriculum Journal, May, 594–612. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.213

Furaida, L., & Suryo, E. (2021). Implementasi Teori Belajar Sibernetika Pada Pembelajaran Filsafat Ilmu. Jurnal EPISTEMA, 2(1).

Ge, X., Law, V., & Huang, K. (2016). Detangling the interrelationships between self-regulation and ill-structured problem solving in problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1622

Gregory, J. Haynes, K. M. (2017). The Routledge international handbook of Philosophy for Children. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

Hagemann, V., & Kluge, A. (2017). Complex problem solving in teams: The impact of collective orientation on team process demands. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(SEP), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01730

Hickey, G. (2014). The Importance of Learning Philosophies on Technology Selection in Education. Journal of Learning Design, 7(3), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v7i3.184

John Morgan, W. (2021). What is a philosophy of education? RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 25(4), 565–573. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2021-25-4-565-573

Khalid, M., Saad, S., Abdul Hamid, S. R., Ridhuan Abdullah, M., Ibrahim, H., & Shahrill, M. (2020). Enhancing creativity and problem solving skills through creative problem solving in teaching mathematics. Creativity Studies, 13(2), 270–291. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2020.11027

Lai, E. R., & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st century skills: integrating research findings. Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Vancouver, BC, Canada, April, 66.

Riandi, N. D. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Bepikir Kompleks Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Bernbasis Masalah Berbantuan Mind Mapping. Edusains, Vol. 8 No., 1–23. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i1.1805

Rizky Ananda Setiyawan, & Palupi Sri Wijayanti. (2020). Analisis Kualitas Instrumen Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Selama Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi. Jurnal Lebesgue : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika, 1(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v1i2.26

Şahan, H. H. (2020). The Relationship of Prospective Teachers’ Educational Philosophy and Life-long Learning Tendencies to their Teaching-learning Process Competencies. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 10(4), 1325–1367. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2020.040

Sayani, A. H. (2015). My Philosophy of Teaching and Learning. OALib, 02(12), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1102109

Seibert, S. A. (2021). Problem-based learning: A strategy to foster generation Z’s critical thinking and perseverance. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(1), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.09.002

Si, J., Kong, H. H., & Lee, S. H. (2018). Developing clinical reasoning skills through argumentation with the concept map method in medical problem-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 13(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1776

Sufyan, Q.A., Hartono, S. . (2023). Reason as A Source of Islamic Law: Epistemological Approach. Islamuna: Jurnal Studi Islam., 10(1), 19-. https://doi.org/10.19105/islamuna.v10i1.7835

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Veltman, M. E., van Keulen, J., & Voogt, J. M. (2021). Using problems with wicked tendencies as vehicles for learning in higher professional education: Towards coherent curriculum design. Curriculum Journal, 32(3), 559–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.100

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): December

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.

Authors who publish with IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.