Reorganizing Christian Education After the Pandemic in Indonesia: A Need for Learning Management

Authors

  • Kristyana Kristyana Sekolah Tinggi Pendidikan Agama Kristen (STIPAK) Malang
  • Sri Wahyuni Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Lintas Budaya Batam
  • Roy Pieter Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Kingdom Bali
  • Vernando Purba Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Arastamar Riau
  • Meri K.D. Sitepu Sekolah Tinggi Teologi Arastamar Riau
  • Ronny Simatupang Institut Agama Kristen Negeri (IAKN) Tarutung
  • Sandy Ariawan Institut Agama Kristen Negeri (IAKN) Tarutung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v4i2.5138

Keywords:

Christian Education, Learning Management, Learning Achievement, Post-Pandemic.

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the influence of learning management on the learning achievements of Christian education. The data analysis methods used were simple correlation analysis method, simple linear regression analysis and t test. The samples in this study were 95 Christian students of state senior high school. The relationship between Learning Management (X) and Learning Achievement (Y) amounted to 0.661. The correlation relationship rate was in the high category. So there was a positive relationship with the low category between Learning Management and Student Learning Achievement. R Square of 0.437 this showed that the influence of Learning Management with Student Learning Achievement was 43.70% and the remaining 56.3% was influenced by other factors not discussed in this study. The t test was conducted by comparing tcount and ttable. In accordance with the testing requirements that tcount (3,580) > ttable (0,2796), this means that the variables of Learning Management have a positive and significant influence on the Student Learning Achievement. Thus Ho refused and Ha was accepted. Considering the high influence of learning management on learning achievement, teachers need to reorganize the learning patterns of Christian education. The focus of change is directed at planning, organizing, directing, and controlling the materials and the class as well.

References

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11428813

Ariawan, S. (2019). Countering Zeitgeist of Self-Centered through Role Playing Methods among Junior High School Students. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application). https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v2i3.2143

Ariawan, S. (2020). Etika Guru Pendidikan Agama Kristen. Pena Persada.

Ariawan, S., . K., Nurprasetyaningsih, N., & . R. (2020). Virtual Discussion for Improving Motivation: A Christian Education Strategy against Covid-19 Pandemic Effect. International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2020.56

Ariawan, S., & Malang, S. (2020). Building Critical Thinking in Covid-19 Pandemic Era: Impossible or I am Possible? International Research Journal on Advanced Science Hub. https://doi.org/10.47392/irjash.2020.49

Bacca, J., Baldiris, S., Fabregat, R., Graf, S., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Educational Technology and Society.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Educational Research.

Green, E. (2012). Analysing religion and education in Christian academies. British Journal of Sociology of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.659456

Liu, S., & Hallinger, P. (2018). Principal Instructional Leadership, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Teacher Professional Learning in China: Testing a Mediated-Effects Model. Educational Administration Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048

Riyantono, S., & Hatmawan, A. A. (2020). Metode Riset Penelitian Kuantitatif. In Metode Riset Penelitian Kuantitatif Penelitian Di Bidang Manajemen, Teknik, Pendidikan Dan Eksperimen (p. 63).

Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: Fourth edition. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R & D.Bandung:Alfabeta. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Wang, Y. (2017). Education policy research in the big data era: Methodological frontiers, misconceptions, and challenges. Education Policy Analysis Archives. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.3037

Wang, Y. (2020). When artificial intelligence meets educational leaders’ data-informed decision-making: A cautionary tale. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100872

Wang, Y., & Bowers, A. J. (2016). Mapping the field of educational administration research: a journal citation network analysis. Journal of Educational Administration. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2015-0013

Downloads

Published

2021-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles