The Effectiveness Smart Chart to Improve the Students Understanding in Linguistic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v5i2.8175Keywords:
Smart Chart, Station, English Linguistic.Abstract
Difficult in understanding the saintific book, the monoutone learning method and uninteresting way to learn the Linguistic was the the classic problem which never resolved up to now. The purposes of this research are to cover the students’ problems in understanding Morphemes and Syntax Material based in virtual learning, reduce the students’ pressure and Increase the students’ motivation to learn Morphemes and Syntax material using Smart Chart. In implication, this reseach using experimental research with one group pre-test and post-test. The research was done for the English Department Students by using population and sampe is 32 students whose taken Morpheme and Syntax subject. This research designed was suitable which education atmoshere atmosphere in this era. The technique of sampling is using purposive sampling as the collecting data. Even the lecturer must be working hard and need more time to prepare the learning process, the students show the value table is 1,696 and value of t-test is 20,42. It means that Smart Chart Technique is effective and the students got good achievement.
References
Crossley, S. (2020). Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview. Journal of Writing Research, 11(3), 415–443. https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2020.11.03.01
Cruz, R. F., & Tantia, J. F. (2017). Reading and Understanding Qualitative Research. American Journal of Dance Therapy, 39(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10465-016-9219-z
Hrastinski, S. (2019). What Do We Mean by Blended Learning? TechTrends, 63(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5
Matchin, W., & Hickok, G. (2020). The Cortical Organization of Syntax. Cerebral Cortex, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz180
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177
Muhid, A., Amalia, E. R., Hilaliyah, H., Budiana, N., & Wajdi, M. B. N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive strategies implementation on students’ reading comprehension achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13257a
Pino, L. K., Just, S. C., MacCoss, M. J., & Searle, B. C. (2020). Acquiring and Analyzing Data Independent Acquisition Proteomics Experiments without Spectrum Libraries. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, 19(7). https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.P119.001913
Rosiana, C. (2020). Productive Reading Activity Dalam Mempelajarai Sosiologi Dan Linguistik. Historis : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Sejarah, 5(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.31764/historis.vXiY.3423
Rosiana, C. (2021). Pengembangan Materi Morpho-Sytax Melalui Smart Chart. Jurnal Kiprah, 9(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v9i1.3310
Roy, D. K. (2002). Learning visually grounded words and syntax for a scene description task. Computer Speech and Language, 16(3–4), 353–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2308(02)00024-4
Sukman, S., Mistar, J., & Fikri, D. (2020). The Differences in Reading Skills between Auditory Learners and Visual Learners | SUKMAN | Jurnal Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Pembelajaran. http://www.riset.unisma.ac.id/index.php/jp3/article/view/8262
Sulistyo, G. H. (2015). English as a Measurement Standard in the National Examination: Some Grassroots’ Voice. TEFLIN Journal - A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 20(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v20i1/1-24
Tariq, T. R., Rana, M. A., Sultan, B., Asif, M., Rafique, N., & Aleem, S. (2020). An Analysis of Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes. International Journal of Linguistics, 12(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v12i1.16084
Truitt, A. A., & Ku, H. Y. (2018). A case study of third grade students’ perceptions of the station rotation blended learning model in the United States. Educational Media International, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1484042
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:
- Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
- The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
- That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
- That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
- Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
- Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.
Authors who publish with IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Â
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
