KARAKTERISTIK MODAL SOSIAL MASYARAKAT DALAM PENGEMBANGAN DESA WISATA DI DESA BANGELAN KABUPATEN MALANG

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/geography.v10i1.7465

Keywords:

Level of Readiness, Tourism Village, Community Readiness Model

Abstract

Abstrak: Desa bangelan yang terletak di Kabupaten Malang, tepatnya di Kecamatan Wonosari dengan luas wilayah 167,2 Ha memiliki potensi pengembangan desa wisata yang sangat baik. Potensi peternakan dan pertanian didukung dengan sumberdaya alam air dapat dikembangan sebagai destinasi wisata di Kabupaten Malang. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui karakteristik modal sosial masyarakat Desa bangelan dalam mendukung pengembangan desa wisata. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan mengunakan pertanyaan terstruktur (kuesioner) terhadap responden serta wawancara dan observasi. Metode yang digunakan yaitu metode deskriptif kuantitatif, dengan teknik analisa statistik deskriptif untuk karakteristik masyarakat dan karakteristik modal social. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat Desa Bangelan memiliki modal sosial yang baik dalam kepercayaan, norma, dan jaringan pengetahuan dan pemahaman dasar terhadap pengambangan desa wisata. Jaringan sosial merupakan factor utama dalam pembentuk modal social dan merupakan faktor dalam utama dalam pengembangan desa wisata. Sedangkan faktor karakteristik masyarakat yang mempengaruhi tingkat modal social diantaranya jenis pekerjaan, pendidikan dan usia produktif dalam pengembangan desa wisata.


Abstract:  Bangelan village, located in Malang Regency, precisely in Wonosari District with an area of 167.2 Ha, has excellent tourism village development potential. The development of livestock and agriculture supported by natural water resources could improve tourist destinations in Malang Regency. The purpose of this study was to determine the characteristics of the social capital of the Bangelan Village community in supporting the development of a tourist village. Data was collected using structured questions (questionnaires) to respondents, interviews, and observations. The method used is descriptive quantitative, with descriptive statistical analysis techniques for community and social capital characteristics. The results showed that the people of Bangelan Village had good social capital in beliefs, norms, and social networks and a basic understanding of tourism village development. Social networks are the main factor in forming social capital and are a significant factor in the development of tourist villages. While the characteristics of the community that affect the level of social capital include the type of work, education, and productive age in the development of tourist villages.

Author Biography

Gunawan Prayitno, Universitas Brawijaya

Department Regional and Urban Planning

References

Davis, J. S., & Morais, D. B. (2004). Factions and enclaves: Small towns and socially unsustainable tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 43(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287504265501

Dewi, P., Prayitno, G., & Dinanti, D. (2021). Social Capital of the Pujon Kidul Tourism Village Community in Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 38(4), 1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.38431-765

Khazami, N., & Lakner, Z. (2021). The mediating role of the social identity on agritourism business. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(20), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011540

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

McGill, R. (1970). Building capacity for local government to perform. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 6, 90–106. https://doi.org/10.5130/cjlg.v0i6.1624

Nugraha, A. T., Prayitno, G., Hasyim, A. W., & Roziqin, F. (2021). Social capital, collective action, and the development of agritourism for sustainable agriculture in rural Indonesia. Evergreen, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5109/4372255

Ontorael, M. R., Sondakh, T., & Laloma, A. (2015). PENGARUH MODAL SOSIAL MASYARAKAT PEDESAAN TERHADAP KEBERHASILAN PEMBANGUNAN DESA DI KECAMATAN PINELENG KABUPATEN MINAHASA. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 02(029).

Pavey, J. L., Muth, A. B., Ostermeier, D., & Davis, M. L. E. S. (2007). Building Capacity for Local Governance: An Application of Interactional Theory to Developing a Community of Interest*. Rural Sociology, 72, 90–110. https://doi.org/10.1526/003601107781147419

Pramanik, P., Ingkadijaya, R., & Achmadi, M. (2019). The Role of Social Capital in Community Based Tourism. Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Development Studies, 7(2), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jitode.2019.07.02.02

Prayitno, G., Subagiyo, A., Rusmi, S., & Evelina. (2019). Perencanaan Desa Terpadu: Modal Sosial dan Perubahan Lahan (1st ed.). AE Medika Grafika.

Prayitno, G., Surjono, Hidayat, A. R. T., Subagiyo, A., & Paramasasi, N. K. (2018). Factors that effect to land use change in Pandaan District. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 202(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/202/1/012006

Putnam, R. D., & Goss, K. A. (2002). Democracies in Flux: The Evolution of Social Capital in Contemporary Society. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0195150899.003.0001

Reeder, R. J., & Brown, D. M. (2005). Recreation, tourism, and rural well-being. In USDA Studies, 25, 231e238. ERS report no. 7. https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/46126/15112_err7_1_.pdf?v=0

Vujko, A., Zevcević-Stanojević, O., Zevcević, L., Nedeljković, D., & Zevcević, M. (2021). Rural residents’ perceptions on economic impacts of cultural and promotional aspects of tourism. Ekonomika Poljoprivrede (1979), 68, 155–172.

Zhao, W., Ritchie, J. R. B., & Echtner, C. M. (2011). Social capital and tourism entrepreneurship. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(4), 1570–1593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2011.02.006

Downloads

Published

2022-04-18

Issue

Section

Articles