PENGUATAN KEWIRAUSAHAAN MAHASISWA MELALUI PELATIHAN WAY TO ENTREPRENEURSHIP DI INKUBATOR BISNIS UNIVERSITAS TRILOGI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/jmm.v7i5.16995Keywords:
Competency, Entrepreneurship, Incubation, Tenant, Training.Abstract
Abstrak: Peran entrepreneurship menjadi semakin penting dalam mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi dan inovasi. Sebagai respons terhadap tantangan ini, kami menyelenggarakan pelatihan Way to Entrepreneurship. Tujuan pelatihan adalah membekali mahasiswa Universitas Trilogi yang juga tergabung sebagai tenant Inkubator Bisnis dengan pengetahuan dan keterampilan esensial dalam kewirausahaan. Melalui pelatihan ini, diharapkan mahasiswa dapat mempersiapkan diri dan membangun kepercayaan diri dalam memulai dan mengelola bisnis mereka sendiri. Pelatihan dilaksanakan dalam format workshop yang dihadiri 32 peserta. Evaluasi kegiatan dilakukan dengan memberikan angket kepada peserta yang terdiri dari tiga kategori penilaian yaitu narasumber, materi, dan suasana. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa narasumber menguasai materi, komunikatif, menarik, presentasi menarik, tepat waktu, dan memberi kesempatan diskusi dengan skor minimal 4,72. Materi yang disampaikan memiliki tujuan kegiatan jelas, relevan, bermanfaat, sesuai dengan harapan, cakupan memadai, dan sesuai dengan perkembangan industri, dengan nilai minal skor 4,66. Pada suasana kegiatan pelatihan menunjukkan bahwa peserta tidak setuju bahwa kegiatan membosankan dan kurang menarik dengan skor minimal 1,53. Selain itu, peserta juga setuju kegiatan banyak diskusi, peserta aktif berinteraksi, dan pelaksanaan tepat waktu, dengan skor minimal 3,91.
Abstract: The role of entrepreneurship is becoming increasingly important in driving economic growth and innovation. In response to this challenge, we organized the Way to Entrepreneurship training. The purpose of the training is to equip Trilogy University students who are also Business Incubator tenants with essential knowledge and skills in entrepreneurship. Through this training, students are expected to prepare themselves and build confidence in starting and managing their own business. The training was conducted in a workshop format with 32 participants. The evaluation was carried out using questionnaires that assessed three categories: the speaker, the material, and the atmosphere. The results demonstrated that the speaker effectively mastered the material, was communicative, engaging, timely, and facilitated discussions, with a minimum score of 4.72. The presented material was clear in its objectives, relevant, beneficial, met expectations, had adequate coverage, and was in line with industry developments, with a minimum score of 4.66. In terms of the training atmosphere, participants disagreed that the event was boring and lacked interest with a minimum score of 1.53. Furthermore, participants agreed that the event facilitated ample discussions, active participant interaction, and was executed on time, with a minimum score of 3.91.
References
Abaho, E., Olomi, D. R., & Urassa, G. C. (2015). Students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy: does the teaching method matter? Education+ Training.
Ahmed, T., Chandran, V. G. R., Klobas, J. E., Liñán, F., & Kokkalis, P. (2020). Entrepreneurship education programmes: How learning, inspiration and resources affect intentions for new venture creation in a developing economy. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(1), 100327. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2019.100327
Akinboye, A. K., & Morrish, S. C. (2022). Conceptualizing post-disaster entrepreneurial decision-making: Prediction and control under extreme environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 68, 102703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102703
Boubker, O., Arroud, M., & Ouajdouni, A. (2021). Entrepreneurship education versus management students’ entrepreneurial intentions. A PLS-SEM approach. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1), 100450. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100450
Chatterjee, I., Shepherd, D. A., & Wincent, J. (2022). Women’s entrepreneurship and well-being at the base of the pyramid. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(4), 106222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106222
Chaudhary, S., Dhir, A., Ferraris, A., & Bertoldi, B. (2021). Trust and reputation in family businesses: A systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Journal of Business Research, 137(March), 143–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.052
Chikileva, L. S. (2019). The role of the tutor in the choice of pedagogical management tools for autonomous work in foreign languages. Ð˜Ð½Ñ‚ÐµÐ³Ñ€Ð°Ñ†Ð¸Ñ ÐžÐ±Ñ€Ð°Ð·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ, 23(3), 475–489.
Cho, Y. H., & Lee, J.-H. (2018). Entrepreneurial orientation, entrepreneurial education and performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-05-2018-0028
Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2015). The Impact of Entrepreneurship Education on Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Intention: Hysteresis and Persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065
Gielnik, M. M., Frese, M., Kahara-Kawuki, A., Wasswa Katono, I., Kyejjusa, S., Ngoma, M., Munene, J., Namatovu-Dawa, R., Nansubuga, F., Orobia, L., Oyugi, J., Sejjaaka, S., Sserwanga, A., Walter, T., Bischoff, K. M., & Dlugosch, T. J. (2015). Action and Action-Regulation in Entrepreneurship: Evaluating a Student Training for Promoting Entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 14(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0107
Herrington, M., & Kew, P. (2017). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2016/17 global report. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA).
Hisrich, R. D. (2015). International entrepreneurship: starting, developing, and managing a global venture. Sage Publications.
Kazumi, T., & Kawai, N. (2017). Institutional support and women’s entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjie-12-2017-041
Lee, C., Hallak, R., & Sardeshmukh, S. R. (2016). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and restaurant performance: A higher-order structural model. Tourism Management, 53, 215–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.017
Li, J., Zhang, J., Paul, J., & Du, J. (2022). Comparisons of entrepreneurial passion’s structure and its antecedents: latent profile analyses in China and South Korea. Asian Business and Management, 21(3), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00140-0
Lim, J. Y., Kim, J., & Kim, S. (2021). The effects of the Start-Up NurseS program on nursing students using management strategy simulation. Nurse Education Today, 105, 105020. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105020
Lorz, M., Mueller, S., & Volery, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Review Of The Methods In Impact Studies. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 21(02), 123–151. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218495813500064
Lyu, J., Shepherd, D., & Lee, K. (2023). The impact of entrepreneurship pedagogy on nascent student entrepreneurship: an entrepreneurial process perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2220722
Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J., & Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211–224.
Maulidian, M., Sumiasih, I. H., Puspitawati, M. D., & Seftiono, H. (2021a). Program Pengembangan Kewirausahaan Di Fakultas Bioindustri Universitas Trilogi 2019–2021. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Dan Corporate Social Responsibility (PKM-CSR), 4, 1213–1220.
Maulidian, M., Sumiasih, I. H., Puspitawati, M. D., & Seftiono, H. (2022). Pelatihan Pola Pikir Wirausaha Terhadap Perubahan Pada Tenant Fakultas Bioindustri, Universitas Trilogi. Jurdimas (Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat) Royal, 5(2), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.33330/jurdimas.v5i2.1287
Maulidian, Sumiasih, I. H., Puspitawati, M. D., & Seftiono, H. (2021b). Pelatihan Kewirausahaan Untuk Meningkatkan Softskill Dan Hardskill Pada Tenant Fakultas Bioindustri. Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri, 5(6), 3212–3225. http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/jmm
Maurer, J. D., Creek, S. A., Bendickson, J. S., McDowell, W. C., & Mahto, R. V. (2022). The three pillars’ impact on entrepreneurial activity and funding: A country-level examination. Journal of Business Research, 142, 808–818. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.080
Nabi, G., Liñán, F., Fayolle, A., Krueger, N., & Walmsley, A. (2017). The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 16(2), 277–299.
Newman, A., Obschonka, M., Schwarz, S., Cohen, M., & Nielsen, I. (2019). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A systematic review of the literature on its theoretical foundations, measurement, antecedents, and outcomes, and an agenda for future research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110(October 2017), 403–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.05.012
Nziku, D. M., & Henry, C. (2021). Policies for supporting women entrepreneurs in developing countries: the case of Tanzania. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 10(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-09-2020-0073
Pham, D., & Pham, Q. (2020). The impact of CEO duality on firm performance: Examining the life-cycle theory in Vietnam. Accounting, 6(5), 737–747.
Pindado, E., Sánchez, M., Verstegen, J. A. A. M., & Lans, T. (2018). Searching for the entrepreneurs among new entrants in European Agriculture: the role of human and social capital. Land Use Policy, 77(April), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.014
Saeed, S., Yousafzai, S. Y., Yani-De-Soriano, M., & Muffatto, M. (2015). The Role of Perceived University Support in the Formation of Students’ Entrepreneurial Intention. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(4), 1127–1145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12090
Santana-DomÃnguez, I., Ballesteros-RodrÃguez, J. L., & DomÃnguez-Falcón, C. (2022). An application of training transfer literature to the analysis of training for entrepreneurship: A conceptual model. The International Journal of Management Education, 20(2), 100649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100649
Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. World Economic Forum. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=mQQwjwEACAAJ
Simarasl, N., Tabesh, P., Munyon, T. P., & Marzban, Z. (2022). Unveiled confidence: Exploring how institutional support enhances the entrepreneurial self-efficacy and performance of female entrepreneurs in constrained contexts. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2022.07.003
Spinelli, S., Ensign, P. C., & Adams, R. J. (2014). New venture creation. McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
van Ewijk, A. R., & Weber, W. (2021). The value of knowing what you want: Goal hierarchy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 15, e00215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00215
World Economic Forum. (2022). The future of jobs report 2020 | world economic forum. The Future of Jobs Report, October, 1163. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-future-of-jobs-report-2020/digest
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish articles in JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
