Description of Junior High School Students’ Mathematical Understanding According to Skemp Theory in terms of Rational Personality Types
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i2.13179Keywords:
Mathematical understanding, Skemp's theory of understanding, Rational personality.Abstract
Mathematical understanding is one of the supporting factors for students' success in mathematics. Skemp divides understanding into two types, namely instrumental understanding and relational understanding. This research purpose was to describe the mathematical understanding of seventh grade D students in solving set problems based on Skemp's theory of understanding in terms of rational personality types. The type of research used was descriptive qualitative. This research was conducted at Junior High School Darul Aman Mataram of 2021/2022 academic year. Selection of subjects using a purposive sampling technique. The subjects in this study were two students with rational personality types. Data were obtained using a mathematical understanding test and interviews. The study's results showed that students with rational personality types tend to have a relational understanding because they can explain reasons or interpret problem-solving procedures according to the set concept correctly. In addition, students are able to understand the purpose of the given set of problems, can apply ideas according to the logic of thinking in solving problems, can write problem solving procedures coherently according to Skemp's theory even though they tend to be brief, can solve mathematical understanding problems accompanied by appropriate answer arguments, can change mathematical sentences in the given problem in the form of words, images, or certain mathematical symbols. Furthermore, this type can achieve all of the indicators of instrumental understanding and can fulfill the six indicators of relational understanding, except for the ability to correlate several set concepts. Based on these results, it is expected that rational personality type students can determine detailed planning in solving problems, and improve understanding of mathematical concepts such as being more careful in the use of solution strategies so that students are accustomed to applying various solution strategies.References
Ahmadah, I. F. (2020). Algebraic Reasoning of Student with Keirsey Personality Type in Solving Mathematical Problem. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v9i2.7191
Akrom, M., Triyanto, & Nurhasanah, F. (2021). Profile of Senior High School Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability Based on Guardian Personality Type. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(1), 16–28. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i11.2149
Annisa, M., Aan, H., & Tatang, H. (2019). Analysis of Students Mathematical Understanding Viewed from Visual and Visual-Auditory Learning Styles. International Seminar STEMEIF (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Learning International Forum), 386–393.
Arifin, S., Wahyudin, & Herman, T. (2021). The Effect of Students’ Mathematics Self-efficacy on Mathematical Understanding Performance. İlköğretim Online, 20(1), 617–627. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.52
Asih, & Imami, A. I. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis Siswa SMP Kelas VIII Pada Materi Himpunan. Maju, 8(2), 9–16.
Baiti, A. N., Sutopo, & Kurniawati, I. (2020). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep pada Materi Bangun Datar Segiempat ditinjau dari Umpan Balik (Feedback) Siswa Kelas VII SMP Islam Diponegoro Surakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019. 4(1), 23–33.
Dini, M., Wijaya, T. T., & Sugandi, A. I. (2018). Pengaruh Self Confidence terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematik Siswa SMP. JURNAL SILOGISME, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24269/js.v3i1.936
Embarak, O., Khan, Z., & Gurung, B. (2019). Understanding Students Personality to Detect Their Learning Differences. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, 29, 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12839-5_35
Fahira, A. (2021). Pengaruh Pendekatan STEM Berbantuan Microsoft Mathematics Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep. Urnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika AL-QALASADI, 5(1), 44–51.
Fitria, C. I. S. S. S. (2016). Analisis Kesulitan Metakognisi Siswa DalamMemecahkan Masalah Sistem PertidaksamaanLinear Dua Variabel Ditinjau Dari TipeKepribadian Guardian, Artisan, Rational,Dan Idealist Kelas X Smkn I Jombang. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(9), 824–835. http://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id
Fitriana, L. D., Fuad, Y., & Ekawati, R. (2018). Student’s Critical Thinking in Solving Open-Ended Problems Based on Their Personality Type. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012007
Güngör, F., Kurt, H., & Ekici, G. (2014). The Relationship between Personality Types and Self-efficacy Perceptions of Student Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 786–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.298
Hasanah, U., & Putra, R. W. Y. (2017). Analisis Proses Berpikir Kreatif dalam Memecahkan Matematika Ditinjau dari Tipe Kepribadian Rational dan Artisan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika 2017 UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 1(1), 137–149.
Ibrahim, U. (2015). Frameworks for Teachers ’ Knowledge of Mathematics. 5(9), 93–102.
Jbeili, I. (2012). The Effect of Cooperative Learning with Metacognitive Scaffolding on Mathematics Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Fluency. International Journal for Research in Education, 32(32), 45–71.
Keirsey, D. (1998). Please Understand Me II: Temperament, Character, Intelligence. In Prometheus Nemesis.
Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. M. (1984). Please Understand Me: Character and Temperament Types.
Komariyah, S., Afifah, D. S. N., & Resbiantoro, G. (2018). Analisis Pemahaman Konsep dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Siswa. SOSIOHUMANIORA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.30738/sosio.v4i1.1477
Kuncorowati, R. H., Mardiyana, M., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2017). The Analysis of Student’s difficulties Based on Skemp’s Understanding Theorem at The Grade VII in Quadrilateral Topic. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 2(1), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v2i1.16736
Limardani, G., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Fatahillah, A. (2015). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Operasi Aljabar pada Siswa Kelas VIII D SMP Negeri 4 Jember. Artikel Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1(1), 1–7.
MacDonald, A. (2022). Contextual influences on children’s mathematical understandings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 35, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100632
Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, J. (2016). A Study of Errors and Misconceptions in the Learning of Addition and Subtraction of Directed Numbers in Grade 8. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016671375
Mayasari, D., Natsir, I., & Zulfiah, M. (2022). How to Design Student Worksheet Based ELPSA Model to Improve Understanding of Mathematics Concepts? JTAM , 6(3), 732–743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i3.8622
Mulyani, A., Indah, E. K. N., & Satria, A. P. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Smp Pada Materi Bentuk Aljabar. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v7i2.24
NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Negara, H. S. (2015). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Pemahaman, Koneksi dan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar (SD) melalui Reciprocal Teaching. Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 2(1), 138–149.
Nurhana, F., & Abdullah, A. A. (2021). Effectiveness of Contextual Teaching and Learning on The Ability to Mathematical Relational Understanding in Junior High School. Eduma : Mathematics Education Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 198-205. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v10i2.9087
Pambudi, D. S., Murtikusuma, R. P., Trapsilasiwi, D., Oktavianingtyas, E., Wiliandani, I., & Ningrum, T. P. (2021). Mathematical Representation of the Grade 11 of Senior High School Students in Solving Linear Programming Questions Based on David Keirsey’s Personality Type. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Mathematics and Mathematics Education (ICMMEd 2020), 162–166. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210508.059
Putra, R. W. Y., Supriadi, N., Ilmiyana, M., Khoiriah, K., Fitriani, D., Aziz, A. F., & Solihat, T. (2019). The Analysis of the Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability of High School Students Reviewed from Personality Types of the Rational and Artisan. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012039
Rahman, I. . F., Pomalato, S., & Djabar, M. A. (2018). Analisis Pemahaman Konseptual Dan Kemampuan Prosedural Matematika Ditinjau Dari Tipe Kepribadian Siswa Di SMP Negeri 1 Pinogaluman. Jurnal Riset Dan Pengembangan Ilmu Pengetahuan, 03(1), 7–12. http://ejurnal.pps.ung.ac.id/index.php/JPS/article/view/157
Ratnaningsih, N. (2021). Mathematical creative thinking process of the students: An analysis of Wallas stages and personality types. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012111
Skemp, R. (1976). Richard_Skemp.pdf. In Mathematics Teaching. 77, 20–26.
Skemp, R. R. (1978). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 26(3), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtms.12.2.0088
Surya, E., Putri, F. A., & Mukhtar. (2017). Improving mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of high school students through contextual learning model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.8.1.3324.85-94
Tianingrum, R., & Sopiany, H. N. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa SMP pada Materi Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 440–446. http://pmat-unsika.eu5.org/Prosiding/64RisnaTianingrum-SESIOMADIKA-2017.pdf
Wulan, E. R., & Astuti, F. (2022). Mathematical Literacy with Islamic Nuances Based on Prospective Mathematics Teachers ’ Personality. 4185, 230–247. https://doi.org/10.24815/jdm.v9i2.26975
Wulansari, I., & Walid, W. (2021). Analysis of students mathematics communication ability based on Keirsey personality type through accelerated learning model. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.32178
Yang, Z., Yang, X., Wang, K., Zhang, Y., Pei, G., & Xu, B. (2021). The Emergence of Mathematical Understanding: Connecting to the Closest Superordinate and Convertible Concepts. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.525493
Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math-Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(5), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0100-9
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
