A Critical Thinking Profile of Mathematics Education Students in Solving Ill-Structured Problem based on Mathematical Ability

Authors

  • Abd Kadir Jaelani Department of Mathematics Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Muhammad Hasbi Institut Agama Islam (IAI) As’adiyah Sengkang, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6862-4109
  • Baharullah Baharullah Department of Mathematics Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i2.13378

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, Mathematics Education Students, Ill-Structured Problem, Mathematical Ability.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the critical thinking profile of mathematics education students in solving ill-structured problems based on mathematical ability. The critical thinking profile in solving the described ill-structured problem consists of several stages, namely (1) Analyze; (2) Browse; (3) Create; (4) Decision-making; (5) Evaluate; and (6) List or with the term A-B-C-D-E plus L based on critical thinking skills, namely (1) Interpretation; (2) Analysis; (3) Conclusion; (4) Evaluation; (5) Explanation; and (6) Self-regulation. The subjects of this study consisted of one student of mathematics education who had the high mathematical ability and one student of mathematics education who had the moderate mathematical ability. They were interviewed based on the results of the Ill-Structured problem-solving. This research used a descriptive qualitative approach. The data obtained were validated, then analyzed with several steps, namely: reduction, data presentation, categorization, interpretation, and inference. The results showed that the mathematics education students carried out critical thinking processes in solving ill-structured problems through six (6) stages, namely: Analyze, Browse, Create, Decision-making, Evaluate, and List or with the term A-B-C-D-E plus L, those which refer to the stages of critical thinking skills, including Interpretation, Analysis, Conclusions, Evaluation, Explanation, and Self-regulation.

 

References

Araiku, J., Parta, I. N., & Rahardjo, S. (2019). Analysis of students’ mathematical problem solving ability as the effect of constant ill-structured problem’s employment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166(1), 012020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012020

Arigawati, N. H., & Kusnandi, K. (2021). Students Critical Thinking Reviewed from Field-Dependent and Field-Independent on Number Pattern Material. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 5(1), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i1.3923

Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM, 51(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2

Chen, C.-H., & Bradshaw, A. C. (2007). The Effect of Web-Based Question Prompts on Scaffolding Knowledge Integration and Ill-Structured Problem Solving. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782487

Cho, M. K., & Kim, M. K. (2020). Investigating Elementary Students’ Problem Solving and Teacher Scaffolding in Solving an Ill-Structured Problem. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(4), 274. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.v8i4.1148

Davis, E. A. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412293

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical Thinking : What It Is and Why It Counts. In Insight assessment (Issue ISBN 13: 978-1-891557-07-1.). https://www.insightassessment.com/CT-Resources/Teaching-For-and-About-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts-PDF

Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them? Applied measurement in education, 29(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207

Hasbi, M., Lukito, A., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). Mathematical Connection Middle-School Students 8 th in Realistic Mathematics Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417(1), 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012047

Hendriana, H., Slamet, U. R., & Sumarmo, U. (2014). Mathematical connection ability and self-confidence (An experiment on Junior High School students through Contextual Teaching and learning with Mathematical Manipulative). International Journal of Education, 8(1), 1–11. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/208947/

Hong, J. Y., & Kim, M. K. (2016). Mathematical Abstraction in the Solving of Ill-Structured Problems by Elementary School Students in Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1204a

Jaelani, A. K., Amin, S. M., & Abadi, A. (2022). Exploring the Critical Thinking Process of Prospective Teachers with High Mathematics Ability in Solving Ill-Structured Problems. Proceedings of the Eighth Southeast Asia Design Research (SEA-DR) & the Second Science, Technology, Education, Arts, Culture, and Humanity (STEACH) International Conference (Seadr-Steach 2021), 627, 52–58. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211229.008

Jaelani, A. K., & Hasbi, M. (2022). Development of Authentic Assessment in Geometry Learning. JRPM (Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika), 7(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2022.7.1.1-19

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299613

Kim, M. K., & Cho, M. K. (2016). Pre-Service Elementary Teachers’ Motivation and Ill-Structured Problem Solving in Korea. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(6), 1569–1587. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1246a

Land, S. M., & Greene, B. A. (2000). Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02313485

Lee, C.-Y., Chen, M.-J., & Chang, W.-L. (2014). Effects of the Multiple Solutions and Question Prompts on Generalization and Justification for Non-Routine Mathematical Problem Solving in a Computer Game Context. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1022a

Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis. SAGE Publications Inc.

Octaria, D., Ningsih, Y. L., Destiniar, D., & Fitriasari, P. (2022). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Test Instruments in Geometry. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(4), 834-843. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i4.8808

Purwati, P., Sumardi, S., Minsih, M., Prastiwi, Y., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Analysis of Students Critical Thinking Skills of 5th Grade in Mathematics Learning. JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika), 6(3), 799-808. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i3.8710

Rotherham, A. J., & Willingham, D. (2009). The 21st-Century Skills. To work, the 21st century skills movement will require keen attention to curriculum, teacher quality, and assessment. Educational Leadership, 67(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483387451.n6

Thomas, T. A. (2011). Developing First Year Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Asian Social Science, 7(4), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v7n4p26

Xun, G., & Land, S. M. (2004). A conceptual framework for scaffolding III-structured problem-solving processes using question prompts and peer interactions. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(2), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504836

Downloads

Published

2023-04-08

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): April

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).