Development of Differentiate Student Worksheets: an Efforts to Improve Student Argumentation Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v8i1.17426Keywords:
Adversity Quotient, Differentiated, Argumentation Ability, Worksheets.Abstract
Online learning experiences have been associated with reduced learning outcomes and limited student engagement in argumentation. To address this issue, the focus on teaching materials becomes crucial, especially in promoting differentiated learning to accommodate pandemic-induced learning losses. A prime candidate for enhancing argumentation skills is the study of quadrilaterals within mathematics. Mastering the quadrilateral concept and its argumentative structure is pivotal for students. Hence, the creation of student worksheets employing differentiated learning principles is imperative. This research aims to develop valid, practical, and effective quadrilateral worksheets with a focus on adversity quotient differentiation. The ADDIE model guides the development process through Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation stages. Rigorous evaluation, including expert validation (83.8% very valid), field trials (91% very practical), and N-Gain score analysis (0.73, indicating effectiveness), underscores the quality of the developed worksheets. In conclusion, the adversity quotient differentiated quadrilateral worksheets has been successfully crafted to enhance students' argumentation skills. It is deemed valid, practical, and effective in improving learning outcomes. This initiative holds potential for addressing the challenges posed by online learning and contributes to students' academic development.References
Agustiningsih, A., Ngatijo, N., & Effendi-Hasibuan, M. H. (2021). The effectiveness of modified flip-based argumentation learning in improving students’ argumentation skills about hydrocarbon. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 13, 250–260. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpkim.v13i3.29930
Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran (2nd ed.). PT Remaja Rosdakarya. http://library.fip.uny.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=7414
Albano, G., & Iacono, U. Dello. (2019). A scaffolding toolkit to foster argumentation and proofs in mathematics : some case studies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0134-5
Aldoobie, N. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68–72. https://www.aijcrnet.com/journals/Vol_5_No_6_December_2015/10.pdf
Amalia, I. F. N., Roesminingsih, M. V., & Yani, M. T. (2022). Pengembangan LKPD Interaktif Berbasis Liveworksheet untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Sekolah Dasar. 6(5), 8154–8162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i5.3762
Aprima, D., & Sari, S. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Pada Pelajaran Matematika SD. Cendikia : Media Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 13(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35335/cendikia.v13i1.2960
Dian Anggraeni, R., & Kustijono, R. (2013). Pengembangan Media Animasi Fisika Pada Materi Cahaya Dengan Aplikasi Flash Berbasis Android. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 3(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v3n1.p11-18
Farida, N., Hasanudin, H., & Suryadinata, N. (2019). Problem Based Learning (Pbl) – Qr-Code Dalam Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Matematika Peserta Didik. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i1.1894
Firman, F., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Online di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science (IJES), 2(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v2i2.659
Grigorieva, E. (2013). Methods of Solving Complex Geometry Problems. Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-00705-2
Herwina, W. (2021). Optimalisasi Kebutuhan Murid Dan Hasil Belajar Dengan Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 35(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.352.10
Hewi, L., & Asnawati, L. (2020). Strategi Pendidik Anak Usia Dini Era Covid-19 dalam Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Berfikir Logis. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 5(1), 158. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v5i1.530
Hilyana, F. S. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Lks Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Bekerjasama Dan Memecahkan Masalah Siswa. PSEJ (Pancasakti Science Education Journal), 2(1). https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v2i1.654
Indrawatiningsih, N., Purwanto, P., As’ari, A. R., & Sa’dijah, C. (2020). Argument mapping to improve student’s mathematical argumentation skills. TEM Journal, 9(3), 1208–1212. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM93-48
Khumairoh, B., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas Menengah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v9i1.259
Kristianti, T. P., Ramli, M., & Ariyanto, J. (2018). Improving the argumentative skills of high school students through teacher’s questioning techniques and argumentative assessment. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012012
Leow, F. T., & Neo, M. (2014). Interactive multimedia learning: Innovating classroom education in a Malaysian university. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(2), 99–110. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1022913
Maarif, S., Wahyudin, W., & Alyani, F. (2020). Kemampuan Mengkonstruksi Bukti Geometri Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Pada Perkuliahan Geometri. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2012
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan (3rd ed.). Alfabeta. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=DCjKEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Mulyatiningsih,+E.+(2014).+Metode+Penelitian+Terapan+Bidang+Pendidikan+(3rd+ed.).+Alfabeta.&ots=z1sPMyu-WJ&sig=8Dl8ji6G2AbZlMfSj9D5H60Q-yw&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Nurpratiwi, T. L., & Setianingsih, R. (2021). Students’ Thinking Processes In Solving Open-Ended Problems Using Online Learning Taking Into Account The Mathematical Ability. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v4i1.5288
Nurrita, T. (2018). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. MISYKAT: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Al-Quran, Hadist, Syari’ah Dan Tarbiyah, 3(1), 171. https://doi.org/10.33511/misykat.v3n1.171
Putra, Z. R. A., & Oktaviane, D. A. K. (2022). Analisis Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Eksponensial Berdasarkan Tingkat Adversity Quotient Siswa. MAJAMATH: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 5(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v5i1
Putra, Z. R. A., Pratama, C. E., & Pramudito, M. S. P. (2023). Pengembangan Modul Ajar Matematika Berdiferensiasi Berbasis Understanding by Design ( UbD ). Postulat: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 128–139. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30587/postulat.v4i1.5695
Putra, Z. R. A., Rahardi, R., Sisworo, S., & Permadi, H. (2023). Profile of Students’ Argumentation Ability Based On Adversity Quotient In Statistical Problem. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v7i1.2330
Putra, Z. R. A., & Wintarti, A. (2020). Development Student’s Worksheets Solid Curved Surface Based On Augmented Reality. Majamath: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36815/majamath.v4i1.896
Rahayu, D., & Budiyono. (2018). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Pemecahan Masalah Bangun Datar. Jpgsd, 6(3), 249–259. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/254876-pengaruh-metode-permainan-sirkuit-pintar-8f6b2278.pdf
Rizal, R., Rusdiana, D., Setiawan, W., & Siahaan, P. (2022). Online Learning Application In Physics For School Course To Enhance Digital Literacy. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 191–203. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1049
Sadieda, L. U. (2019). Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa melalui model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning. Pythagoras: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.21831/pg.v14i1.24038
Safi’i, A., Muttaqin, I., Sukino, Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa’i, M. K. (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon, 7(12), e08510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510
Sally, R., & Renzulli, J. (2018). The Five Dimensions of Differentiation. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 6(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1296874
Sembiring, B. O., & Napitupulu, E. E. (2022). Development of Interactive Student’s Worksheets to Improve Mathematical HOTS of Tenth Grade Students in Trigonometry Topic. Alphamath: Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(November), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.30595/alphamath.v8i2.14363
Sharifah, R., & Faaizah, S. (2015). The Development of Online Project Based Collaborative Learning using ADDIE Model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1803–1812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.392
Siska, S., Yunita, Y., & Ubaidillah, M. (2022). Application of the Socio Scientific Issue Strategy to Improve Students’ Scientific Argumentation Skills on The Concept of the Respiration System in Class XI Mipa SMAN 1 Suranenggala. OPSearch: American Journal of Open Research, 1(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.58811/opsearch.v1i1.4
Soekisno, R. B. A. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Matematis Mahasiswa. Infinity Journal, 4(2), 120. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v4i2.77
Songsil, W., Pongsophon, P., Boonsoong, B., & Clarke, A. (2019). Developing scientific argumentation strategies using revised argument-driven inquiry (rADI) in science classrooms in Thailand. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0035-x
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta. http://repository.unjani.ac.id/repository/bb3c79a5b289950bb62ef247eb2d473a.pdf
Sukmaningrum, R., & Kurniasari, I. (2022). Profile of student’s algebraic thinking in solving mathematics problems reviewing from adversity quotient. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 17(2), 252–259. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3349
Sulistyani, N. H. D., Jamzuri, & Rahardjo, D. T. (2013). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Siswa Antara Menggunakan Media Pocket Book Dan Tanpa Pocket Book Pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Melingkar Kelas X. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 164–172. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/pfisika/article/view/1784
Sunardi, S., & Yudianto, E. (2016). Antisipasi Siswa Level Analisis Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika Dan Matematika Terapan, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu.v5i2.4776
Tama, N. B., Probosari, R. M., & Widoretno, S. (2016). Project Based Learning to Improve Written Argumentation Skill of Tenth Graders. Bioedukasi, 9(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20961/bioedukasi-uns.v9i2.4224
Umbaryati, U. (2016). Pentingnya LKPD pada Pendekatan Scientific Pembelajaran Matematika. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v3i3.56958
Wilkinson, I., Reznitskaya, A., & D’Agostino, J. (2023). Professional development in classroom discussion to improve argumentation: Teacher and student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101732
Wulandari, W., Darmawijoyo, D., & Hartono, Y. (2016). Pengaruh Pendekatan Pemodelan Matematika Terhadap Kemampuan Argumentasi Siswa Kelas Viii Smp Negeri 15 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.10.1.3292.114-126
Yanti, D. N., Ikhsan, J., & Wiyarsi, A. (2023). Guided Inquiry Learning: How to Improve Students’ Argumentation Abilities in Science Learning? Journal of Education Technology, 7(2), 308–314. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v7i2.63193
Zhen, B., Weber, K., & Mejia-Ramos, J. P. (2016). Mathematics Majors’ Perceptions of the Admissibility of Graphical Inferences in Proofs. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0010-1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
