High Visual-Spatial Intelligence Students’ Creativity in Solving PISA Problems

Authors

  • Tabita Wahyu Triutami Universitas Mataram
  • Uun Hariyanti National Central University, Taiwan
  • Dwi Novitasari Universitas Mataram
  • Ratna Yulis Tyaningsih Universitas Mataram
  • Junaidi Junaidi Universitas Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i1.3280

Keywords:

creativity, PISA task, geometry, visual-spatial intelligence

Abstract

Creativity is very necessary for learning mathematics, especially when solving geometry problems. This research aims to describe 4th year mathematics education students’ creativity in solving geometry problems. Creativity in this research is focused on fluency, flexibility, and originality of student anwer when solving geometry problems. This research is an explorative descriptive research through a qualitative approach. The participants were 7 fourth year mathematics education students of state University in Mataram, who have a high level of visual-spatial intelligence. The data was collected by written test and interview. The test consisted of two open-ended geometry problems about transforming 3-dimensional images into 2-dimensional images and making 2-dimensional images with a predetermined circumference. The problems are modification of the 2006 PISA test. The result showed that subjects with high visual-spatial intelligence levels met all indicators of creativity. In solving problems that meet the aspects of fluency, flexibility and originality, they combine mental rotation and mental visualization abilities and include using their visual experience by modifying the information obtained and the initial problem solving ideas obtained. This also enables them to produce original problem solutions. The results of this research can be used as an illustration and a guideline to assess students’ creativity with high visual-spatial intelligence level.

Author Biographies

Tabita Wahyu Triutami, Universitas Mataram

Mathematics Education Study Program

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Uun Hariyanti, National Central University, Taiwan

PhD Student of Graduate Institute of Network Learning Technology

Dwi Novitasari, Universitas Mataram

Mathematics Education Study Program

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Ratna Yulis Tyaningsih, Universitas Mataram

Mathematics Education Study Program

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Junaidi Junaidi, Universitas Mataram

Mathematics Education Study Program

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

References

Agustiningsih, N., Susanto, & Yuliati, N. (2019). Student creative thinking process in solving geometry problems based on van hiele level. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 243, 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/243/1/012126

Ahvan, Y. R., Zainalipour, H., Jamri, M., & Mahmoodi, F. (2016). The correlation between Gardner’s multiple intelligences and the poblem-solving styles and their role in the academic performance achievement of high school students. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 5, 32–39. www.european-science.com

Aini, A. N., Mukhlis, M., Annizar, A. M., Jakaria, M. H. D., & Septiadi, D. D. (2020). Creative thinking level of visual-spatial students on geometry HOTS problems Creative thinking. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012054

Ayllon, M., Gomez, I., & Ballesta-Claver, J. (2016). Mathematical thinking and creativity through mathematical problem posing and solving. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4, 169–218. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/ pyr2016.v4n1.89

Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53, 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.014

Cerrato, A., Siano, G., De Marco, A., & Carlo, R. (2020). The importance of spatial abilities in creativity and their assessment through tangible interfaces. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1008, 89–95.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (P. A. Smith, C. Robb, & M. Buchholtz (eds.); 4th ed.). Pearson education, Inc.

Fauzi, K. M. A., Dirgeyase, I. W., & Priyatno, A. (2019). Building learning path of mathematical creative thinking of junior students on geometry topics by implementing metacognitive approach. International Education Studies, 12, 57. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n2p57

Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/1176460

Gumilar, Y. H., & Nandi, N. (2018). The student’s spatial intelligence level in senior high school. IOP Conference Series: Earth an Environmental Sciences, 145, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012094

Haddar, M., Baslamisli, S. C., Chaari, F., & Haddar, M. (2018). Online identification of road profile variation using a constant piecewise function. Design and Modeling of Mechanical Systems—III, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66697-6_50

Hatch, T. C., & Gardner, H. (1986). From testing intelligence to assesing competences: a pluralistic view of intellect. Roeper Review, 8, 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198609552959

Hendrik, B., Ali, N. M., Sulaiman, R., Masril, M., & Fikri, H. T. (2019). Relationship between intellectual intelligence, Figural Creativity, and Innovation. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 229, 545–555. https://doi.org/10.2991/iciap-18.2019.46

Hua, X., Sun, S., Tang, M., & Han, Z. (2019). Inquiry into mathematics teaching in senior high. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 286, 312–315.

Kahveci, N. G., & Akgul, S. (2019). The relationship between mathematical creativity and intelligence: a study on gifted and general education students. Gifted and Talented International, 0, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1693311

Karwowski, M., Dul, J., Gralewski, J., Jauk, E., Jankowska, D. M., Gajda, A., Chruszczewski, M. H., & Benedek, M. (2016). Is creativity without intelligence possible? A necessary condition analysis. Intelligence, 57, 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.04.006

Kontoyianni, K., Kattou, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Constantinos, C. (2011). Entering the world of mathematically gifted. 19th Biennial World Conference of The WCGTC. Prague, Czech Republic., 1–7.

Leksmono, A., Sunardi, Prihandoko, A. C., & Murtikusuma, R. P. (2019). Students’ creative thinking process in completing mathematical PISA test concerning space and shape. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1211(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1211/1/012073

Lisa, I. W., Susanto, H., Abadyo, & Irawan, E. B. (2018). Junior high school creativity in solving geometry problems. Pancaran Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Jember, 7, 79–86. https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v7i3.194

Nasution, T. K., & Sinaga, B. (2017). Development of student worksheet geometry based metacognitive strategy through creative thinking ability. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0704041018

NCTM. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. The NCTM, Inc. http://www.ghbook.ir/index.php?name=Ùرهنگ Ùˆ رسانه های نوین&option=com_dbook&task=readonline&book_id=13650&page=73&chkhashk=ED9C9491B4&Itemid=218&lang=fa&tmpl=component

Novita, R., & Putra, M. (2016). Using Task Like Pisa’s Problem to Support Student’s. Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1), 31–42. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.7.1.2815.31-42

Novitasari, D., Rahman, A., & Alimuddin. (2015). Profil kreativitas siswa dalam pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari kecerdasan visual spasial dan logis matematis pada siswa SMAN 3 Makassar. Universitas Makassar.

Novitasari, D., Triutami, T. W., Wulandari, N. P., Rahman, A., & Alimuddin. (2020). Students’ Creative Thinking in Solving Mathematical Problems Using Various Representations. In W. Striełkowski & J. Cheng (Eds.), Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Education and Social Sciences (ACCESS 2019) (Vol. 465, Issue Access 2019, pp. 99–102). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200827.026

Ojha, A., Indurkhya, B., & Lee, M. (2017). Intelligence level and the allocation of resources for creative tasks: a pupillometry study. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1263502

Piaw, C. Y., Ishak, A., Yaacob, N. A., Said, H., Pee, L. E., & Kadir, Z. A. (2014). Can multiple intelligence abilities predict work motivation, communication, creativity, and management skills of school leaders? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4870–4874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1040

Piske, F. H. R., Stoltz, T., Vestena, C. L. B., Freitas, S. P. de, Valentim, B. de F. B., Oliveira, C. S. de, Machado Barby, A. A. de O., & Machado, C. L. (2016). Barriers to Creativity, Identification and Inclusion of Gifted Student. Creative Education, 07(14), 1899–1905. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.714192

Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2017). What have we learned about giftedness and creativity? An overview of a five years journey. Creativity and Giftedness, Advances in Mathematics Education, 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3

Purwasih, R., Anita, I. W., & Afrilianto, M. (2019). Junior high school students’ mathematical creative thinking ability based on gender differences in plane and solid geometry subjects. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012073

Renzulli, J. . (1986). The three-ring conception of giftednesss: A developmental model for creative productivity." In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.). In Cambridge University Press.

Rohman, M. (2019). Prepare primary school students to face the technological age: mathematical creativity and spatial ability. Journal AL-MUDARRIS, 2, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.32478/al-mudarris.v2i1.237

Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P. M., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2019). Enriching mathematics education with visual arts: effects on elementary school students’ ability in geometry and visual arts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10018-z

Schoevers, E. M., Leseman, P. P. M., Slot, E. M., Bakker, A., Keijzer, R., & Kroesbergen, E. H. (2019). Promoting pupils’ creative thinking in primary school mathematics: A case study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.02.003

Shoimah, R. N., Lukito, A., & Siswono, T. Y. E. (2018). The creativity of reflective and impulsive selected students in solving geometric problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 947, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/947/1/012023

Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 29, 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x

Singer, F. M., Voica, C., & Pelczer, I. (2017). Cognitive styles in posing geometry problems: implications for assessment of mathematical creativity. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 49, 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0820-x

Sternberg, R. J. (2006). The nature of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Suh, J., & Cho, J. Y. (2020). Linking spatial ability, spatial strategies, and spatial creativity: a step to clarify the fuzzy relationship between spatial ability and creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100628

Suprapto, P. K., bin Ahmad, M. Z., Chaidir, D. M., Ardiansyah, R., & Diella, D. (2018). Spatial intelligence and students’ achievement to support creativity on visuospatial-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7, 224–231. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14322

Triutami, T. W., Novitasari, D., Wulandari, N. P., Purwanto, P., & Abadyo, A. (2020). The Use of Scaffolding to Enhance Students’ Ability in Solving Geometry Problems. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Education and Social Sciences (ACCESS 2019), 465(Access 2019), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200827.025

Tyagi, T. K. (2017). Mathematical intelligence and mathematical creativity: a causal relationship. Creativity Research Journal, 29, 212–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1303317

Utami, S., Usodo, B., & Pramudya, I. (2019). Level of students’ creative thinking in solid geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1227, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1227/1/012023

Velikova, E., & Petkova, M. (2019). Analysing students’ creativity in integrating geogebra applets in solving geometrical problems. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 7, 419–429. https://doi.org/10.22364/bjmc.2019.7.3.08

Widiana, I. W., & Jampel, I. N. (2016). Improving Students’ Creative Thinking and Achievement through The Implementation of Multiple Intelligence Approach with Mind Mapping. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5, 246. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i3.4546

Wulandari, N. P., Triutami, T. W., Novitasari, D., As’ari, A. R., & Dwiyana, D. (2020). Reflective Students in Solving Linear Programming Related Problems. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference on Education and Social Sciences (ACCESS 2019), 465(Access 2019), 123–126. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200827.032

Published

2021-04-17

Issue

Section

Articles