An Analysis of Students’ Errors in Completing Essay HOTS Questions Based On Watson's Criteria Viewed From The Cognitive Style Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i1.3776

Keywords:

HOTS, Watson Criteria, Cognitive Style,

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the students’ errors classified as Field Independent (FI) and Field Dependent (FD) in solving essay HOTS questions based on Watson criteria and to find out the causes of errors experienced by FI and FD types of students in finishing those questions. This was qualitative research which implemented the case study method. This research was carried out at Junior High School 3 Kepanjen Malang of 2019/2020 academic year. Research subjects were determined based on The Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) test results. From the test, two students were selected from each type of cognitive style. The applied data collection included tests and interviews. The qualitative data analysis applied four stages: data reduction, data presentation, conclusion, and verification. The results showed that FI students experienced errors in manipulating calculation, false conclusions, incorrect use of mathematical formulas, and false calculation. On the other hand, FD students had errors in mathematical operation signs, erroneous formula writing, irresponsive to problems, errors of manipulating calculation, and not writing mathematical formulas.

Author Biographies

Teguh Santoso, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Mathemetics Education Department

Yus Mochamad Cholily, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Mathemetics Education Department

Mohammad Syaifuddin, Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Mathemetics Education Department

References

Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of Students’ Errors In Solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Problems For The Topic Of Fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133.

Anwar, K., Liani, L., & Kurniawan, W. (2020). Investigation into First-Year College Students Misconceptions about Limit Concept : A Case Study Based on Cognitive Style. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1445–1452. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080437

Fatemi, A. H. (2014). The Effects of Top-down/Bottom-up Processing and Field-dependent/Field-independent Cognitive Style on Iranian EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension. Theory And Practice In Language Studies, 4(4), 686–693. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.4.686-693

Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., & Kiong, T. T. (2011). The Level of Marzano HOTS Among Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125.

Hidayat, B. R., Sugiarto, B., & Pramesti, G. (2013). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pada Materi Ruang Dimensi Tiga Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa (Analysis of Student Errors in Solving Problems on Three-Dimensional Space Material in terms of Student Cognitive Style). Journal of Mathematics Education Solutions,1(1), 39–46.http://eprints.uns.ac.id/3896/

Hugerat, M., & Kortam, N. (2014). Improving Higher Order Thinking Skills Among Freshmen by Teaching Science Through Inquiry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 447–454. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2014.1107a

Maharani, A., Wahyuni, I., & Oktavianingsih, C. (2020). Watson’s Categories Analysis Of Sequences and Series Question. Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v9i1.p31-40

Mardiana, N., & Kuswanto, H. (2017). Android-Assisted Physics Mobile Learning To Improve Senior High School Students Divergent Thinking Skills And Physics HOTS. The 4th International Conference on Research, Implementation, and Education of Mathematics and Science, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995181

Motvaseli, M., & Lotfizadeh, F. (2015). Entrepreneurs` Cognitive And Decision Making Styles. Asean Marketing Journal, 7(2), 97–108.https://doi/org/10.21002/amj.v7i2.5264

Nasution, F. Y. (2018). Misconception’s Analysis of Students Junior High School In Solving Algebra Problems Term Of Field Independent And Field Dependent Cognitive Styles. The Internasional Conference on Mathematical Analysis, 1–6.https://usd.ac.id/conference/icomaal/proceedings/783-001/

Noh, J., Warren, J., Huh, N., & Ko, H. K. (2013). Instruction Using Scaffolding for Language Learner Students in Solving Mathematical Word Problems. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education, 17(3), 169–180.doi: 10.7468/jksmed.2013.17.3.169

Oktaviani, M. (2017). Analysis of Students Error in Doing Mathematics Problem on Proportion Analysis of Students ’ Error in Doing Mathematics Problem on Proportion. Proceedings of the 2nd Asian Education Symposium, 172–177. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007300601720177

Onyekuru, B. U. (2015). Field Dependence-Field Independence Cognitive Style, Gender, Career Choice and Academic Achievement of Secondary School Students in Emohua Local Government Area of Rivers State. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(10), 76–86.

Orrantia, J., Muñez, D., Vicente, S., Verschaffel, L., & Rosales, J. (2014). Processing of Situational Information In Story Problem Texts. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.8

Patahuddin, S. M., Puteri, I., Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Rika, B. (2017). Capturing Student Mathematical Engagement Through Differently Enacted Classroom Practices : Applying A Modification Of Watson’S Analytical Tool. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(2), 384–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1377300

Perdikaris, S. C. (2011). Using the Cognitive Styles to Explain an Anomaly in the Hierarchy of the Van Hiele Levels. Journal of Mathematical Sciences & Mathematics Education, 6(2), 35–43.http://www.msme.us/2011-2-5.pdf

Rahman, A., & Ahmar, A. S. (2017). Problem Posing of High School Mathematics Student’s Based on Their Cognitive Style. Educational Process: International Journal, 6(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2017.61.1

Ramos, J. L. S., Dolipas, B. B., & Villamor, B. B. (2013). Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance in Physics of College Students: A Regression Analysis. International Journal of Innovative Interdisciplinary Research, 4(4), 7–48.

Seifi, M., Haghverdi, M., & Azizmohamadi, F. (2012). Recognition of Students’ Difficulties in Solving Mathematical Word Problems from the Viewpoint of Teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(3), 2923–2928.

Sofiyah, S. (2018). Analysis Of Students Error In Proving Trigonometric Identities. International Journal of Management and Applied Science, 4(5), 83–86.

Sulistyorini, Y., Argarini, D. F., & Yazidah, N. I. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kombinatorika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif (Error Analysis In Solving Combinatoric Problems In terms of Cognitive Style). Aksioma, 7(1), 114–123.doi: 10.24127/ajpm.v7i1.1360

Tanujaya, B., Mumu, J., & Margono, G. (2017). The Relationship between Higher Order Thinking Skills and Academic Performance of Student in Mathematics Instruction. International Education Studies, 10(11), 78–85. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n11p78

Tarim, K., & Öktem, S. P. (2016). Mathematical Word-Problems That Require Realistic Answer. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(2), 19–38. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.2014.011

Udiyono, U., & Yuwono, M. R. (2018). The Correlation Between Cognitive Style And Students’ Learning Achievement on Geometry Subject. Infinity, 7(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i1.p35-44

Walkington, C., Clinton, V., Ritter, S. N., & Nathan, M. J. (2015). How Readability And Topic Incidence Relate To Performance On Mathematics Story Problems In Computer-Based Curricula. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(4), 1051–1074. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000036

Yang, T., Hwang, G., & Yang, S. J. (2013). Development of an Adaptive Learning System with Multiple Perspectives based on Students Learning Styles and Cognitive Styles. Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185–200.

Yen, T. S., & Halili, S. H. (2015). Effective Teaching of Higher-Order Thinking (HOT) in Education. The Online Journal of Distance Education and E-Learning, 3(2), 41–47.

Zamzam, K. F., & Patricia, F. A. (2018). Error Analysis of Newman to Solve the Geometry Problem in Terms of Cognitive Style. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 160, 24–27. https://doi.org/10.2991/incomed-17.2018.5

Downloads

Published

2021-04-17

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): April

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).