Inproved Math Connection Skills Through Online Learning Using MATH-UNWIR

Authors

  • Diki Mulyana University Wiralodra
  • Mochammad Taufan Universitas Wiralodra
  • Luthfiyati Nurafifah Universitas Wiralodra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i1.3828

Keywords:

Online Learning, MATH-UNWIR, Mathematical Connection.

Abstract

Advances in technology and learning carried out online due to the Covid-19 pandemic are the background for this research. Research objectives to determine the effectiveness of online learning using MATH-UNWIR in improving mathematical connection ability and online learning amid the pandemic Covid-19. This study uses quantitative research with a quasi-type experimental design, as well as a research design using pretest and posttest experimental classes. There are 15 students as research sample. The instruments used was connection skill test and questionare. The data obtained anylized with quantitative method. The average yield pretest was 56,33 and the posttest mean was 81,67. The results of the pretest posttest paired sample t-test showed that there was an average difference significant between pretest and posttest results, so that it brought to an effect of online learning using MATH-UNWIR on students' mathematical connections. The result of the N-Gain score was 0.57. That means it is in the medium category and shows a percentage of 57%. In this study it can be concluded that there is significant influence online learning’ using MATH-UNWIR to improve students' mathematical connections with the interpretation of the effectiveness of increasing mathematical connections quite effectively.Advances in technology and learning carried out online due to the Covid-19 pandemic are the background for this research. Research objectives to determine the effectiveness of online learning using MATH-UNWIR in improving mathematical connection ability and online learning amid the pandemic Covid-19. This study uses quantitative research with a quasi-type experimental design[L1] , as well as a research design using pretest and posttest experimental classes. There are 15 students as research sample. The instruments used was connection skill test and questionare. The data obtained anylized with quantitative method.The average yield pretest was 56,33 and the posttest mean was 81,67. The results of the pretestposttest paired sample t-test showed that there was an average difference significant between pretest and posttest results, so that it brought to an effect of online learning using MATH-UNWIR on students' mathematical connections. The result of the N-Gain score was 0.57. That means it is in the medium category and shows a percentage of 57%. In this study it can be concluded that there is significant influence online learning’ using MATH-UNWIR to improve students' mathematical connections with the interpretation of the effectiveness of increasing mathematical connections quite effectively.

 [L1]1. How many research subjects were involved (research sample)

2. What research instruments do you use?

3. How do you analyze the data you use?

References

Abuhassna, H., & Yahaya, N. (2018). Students’ utilization of distance learning through an interventional online module based on moore transactional distance theory. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 3043–3052. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91606

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., Poulin, R., & Straut, T. T. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the UnitedStates. Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC.

Anderson, J., & Mccormick, P. R. (2005). Ten Pedagogic Principles for E-learning. Insight, December, 6–8.

Anita Azmi, R., Rukun, K., & Maksum, H. (2020). Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Web Mata Pelajaran Administrasi Infrastruktur Jaringan. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4 (2), 303–314. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPP/article/view/25840/15852

Aqip, Z. (2013). Model-Model, Media, dan strategi pembelajaran kontekstual inovatif. Yrama Widya.

Asarta, C. J., & Schmidt, J. R. (2020). The effects of online and blended experience on outcomes in a blended learning environment. Internet and Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100708

Atkeson, A. (2020). What Will Be the Economic Impact of COVID-19 in the US? Rough Estimates of Disease Scenarios. In NBER Working Paper 26867.

Atsani, K. L. G. M. Z. (2020). Transformasi Media Pembelajaran Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 22(1), 65–70. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jtp

Bey, A., & Asriani, A. (2013). Penerapan Pembelajaran Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi SPLDV Jurusan PMIPA-FKIP Universitas Halu Oleo. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 223–239.

Borup, J. (2016a). Teacher perceptions of learner-learner engagement at a cyber high school. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(3), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v17i3.2361

Borup, J. (2016b). Teacher Perceptions of Parent Engagement at a Cyber High School. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(2), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1146560

Borup, J., Chambers, C. B., & Stimson, R. (2019). K-12 student perceptions of online teacher and on-site facilitator support in supplemental online courses. Online Learning Journal, 23(4), 253–280. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.1565

Giatman, M., Siswati, S., & Basri, I. Y. (2020). Online Learning Quality Control in the Pandemic Covid-19 Era in Indonesia. Journal of Nonformal Education, 6(2), 168–175. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jne

Graham, C. R. (2013). Emerging practice and research in blended learning Running Head : RESEARCH IN BLENDED LEARNING The following is a draft version from a chapter soon to be printed in the Handbook of Distance Education . Graham , C . R . ( 2013 ). Emerging practice and rese. January 2013.

Hamat, A., & Hassan, H. A. (2019). Use of social media for informal language learning by Malaysian University Students. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2504-05

Hasler-waters, L., Barbour, M. K., & Menchaca, M. P. (2014). The Nature of Online Charter Schools : Evolution and Emerging Concerns. 17, 379–389.

Hawkins, A., Graham, C. R., Sudweeks, R. R., & Barbour, M. K. (2013). Academic performance, course completion rates, and student perception of the quality and frequency of interaction in a virtual high school. Distance Education, 34(1), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2013.770430

Hui-Chen Lin & Gwo-Jen Hwang. (2019). Research trends of flipped classroom studies for medical courses: a review of journal publications from 2008 to 2017 based on the technology-enhanced learning model. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1011–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1467462

Iftakhar, S. (2016). Google classroom: what works and how? 3, 12–18.

Keaton, W., & Gilbert, A. (2020). Successful Online Learning: What Does Learner Interaction with Peers, Instructors and Parents Look Like? Journal of Online Learning Research.

Kim, C., Park, S. W., Cozart, J., & Lee, H. (2015). From motivation to engagement: The role of effort regulation of virtual high school students in mathematics courses. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(4), 261–272.

Lisa Hasler Waters, P. L. (2014). Who is Teaching? New Roles for Teachers and Parents in Cyber Charter Schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 33–56. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/112373/

Means, B., Wang, H., Young, V., Peters, V. L., & Lynch, S. J. (2016). STEM-focused high schools as a strategy for enhancing readiness for postsecondary STEM programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(5), 709–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21313

Micah N. Bruce-Davis, E. Jean Gubbins, Cindy M. Gilson, Merzili Villanueva, Jennifer L. Foreman, L. D. R. (2014). STEM High School Administrators’, Teachers’, and Students’ Perceptions of Curricular and Instructional Strategies and Practices. Journal of Advanced Academics, 25(3), 272–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X14527952

Nashiroh, P. K., Ekarini, F., & Ristanto, R. D. (2020). Efektivitas Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Berbatuan Mind Map terhadap Kemampuan Pedagogik Mahasiswa Mata Kuliah Pengembangan Program Diklat. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v17i1.22906

Oviatt, D. R., Graham, C. R., Davies, R. S., & Borup, J. (2016). Online student use of a proximate community of engagement in an independent study program. Online Learning Journal, 22(1), 223–251. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1153

Peters-Burton, E. E., Lynch, S. J., Behrend, T. S., & Means, B. B. (2014). Inclusive STEM High School Design: 10 Critical Components. Theory into Practice, 53(1), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.862125

Qin, T. P., & Hua, T. K. (2020). In-game instructions: The extent of their usefulness in enhancing the vocabulary acquisition of ESL learners. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(4), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i04.11647

Saadé, R. G., & Al Sharhan, J. (2015). Discovering the motivations of students when using an online learning tool. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 14(2015), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.28945/2271

Telaumbanua, D. (2020). Urgensi Pembentukan Aturan Terkait Pencegahan Covid-19 di Indonesia. QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 12(01), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.37680/qalamuna.v12i01.290

Turley, C., & Graham, C. R. (2019). Interaction, student satisfaction, and teacher time investment in online high school courses. Journal of Online Learning Research, 5(2), 169–198.

Wen, K. Y. K., & Hua, T. K. (2020). Esl teachers’ intention in adopting online educational technologies during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 7(4), 387–394. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2020.74.387.394

Yanawut Chaiyo, R. N. (2017). The effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the student’s perception in the classrooms response system. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957

Yustinaningrum, B. (2018). The Implementation of E-Learning Web-based Model Centric Course (Edmodo) toward The Mathematics’ Interest and Learning Outcomes. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2175

Zain, F. M., Hanafi, E., Don, Y., Yaakob, M. F. M., & Sailin, S. N. (2019). Investigating student’s acceptance of an EDMODO content management system. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.1241a

Zarzycka-Piskorz, E. (2016). Kahoot it or not?: Can games be motivating in learning grammar? Teaching English with Technology, 16(3), 17–36.

Zhu, C. (2012). Student satisfaction, performance, and knowledge construction in online collaborative learning. Educational Technology and Society, 15(1), 127–136.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-17

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): April

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).