Students’ Concept Construction Errors In Online Learning

Authors

  • Jettson Sihite Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Papua
  • Andi Fajeriani Wyrasti Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Papua http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5714-5636
  • Irfan Irnandi Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika, Universitas Papua

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i1.5337

Keywords:

Concepts of function, Misconstruction errors, Online learning

Abstract

A well-constructed concept can aid pupils in comprehending any learning content. However, as seen by how students solve math problems, the construction process frequently encounters flaws. Students make various conceptual construction errors in online learning. This is a qualitative study conducted on Mathematics Education students of Universitas Papua. The purpose of this study was to determine the errors made by students in constructing concepts of functions during online learning. Five subjects were selected as the subjects. They were chosen by using the purposive sampling technique. The instrument was developed using material from online lectures on functions and has been validated by experts in the field of mathematics education. The findings indicated that there were five misconstruction concepts, i.e. pseudo construction, construction holes, mis-logical construction, mis-analogical construction, and misconstruction in problem-solving. For further research, to avoid unnecessary construction errors, it is recommended that before the learning process is carried out, the teacher should know the construction of students’ concepts, so that the process of students’ conceptual change in online learning can be known.

References

Alawamleh, M., Al-twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2020). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Aaasian Education and Development Studies, (August). https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131

Anggraini, D., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Construction of the mathematical concept of pseudo thinking students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(2018)012010. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1022/1/012010

Apsari, R. A., Sripatmi, S., Sariyasa, S., Maulyda, M. A., & Salsabila, N. H. (2020). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Media Obrolan Kelompok Multi-Arah sebagai Alternatif Kelas Jarak Jauh. Jurnal Elemen, 6(2), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v6i2.2179

Bartell, T. G., Webel, C., Bowen, B., & Dyson, N. (2013). Prospective teacher learning: Recognizing evidence of conceptual understanding. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-012-9205-4

Brodie, K., Coetzee, K., Lauf, L., Modau, S., Molefe, N., & O’Brien, R. (2010). Teaching mathematical reasoning in secondary school classrooms. 1–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09742-8

Cahyo, A. N. (2013). Panduan Aplikasi Teori-teori Belajar Mengajar: Teraktual dan Terpopuler. Jogjakarta: Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.

Cook-wallace, M. K. (2012). Who Is Running Online Education Programs. International Journal of Management, Knowledge and Learning, 1(1), 55–69.

Depdiknas. (2009). Peraturan Menteri Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 TENTANG STANDAR ISI UNTUK SATUAN PENDIDIKAN DASAR DAN MENENGAH, 1–35.

Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A. (2021) Learning loss during Covid ‑ 19 : An early systematic review, November PROSPECTS. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09582-6

He, W., Xu, G., & Kruck, S. E. (2014). Online is education for the 21st century. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(2), 101–105.

Herna. (2020). Konstruksi Pseudo Berdasarkan Kecenderungan Pengetahuan Prosedural. Saintifik, 6(1), 68–76. https://doi.org/10.31605/saintifik.v6i1.251

Herna, Nusantara, T., Subanji, & Mulyati, S. (2016). The Characterization Of True Pseudo Construction In Understanding Concept Of Limit Function. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 6(5), 77–87. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0605037787

Hidayanto, T., Subanji, & Hidayanto, E. (2017). Deskripsi Kesalahan Struktur Berpikir Siswa SMP Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri Serta Defragmentingnya: Suatu Studi Kasus. Jurnal Kajian Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(April), 72–81.

Hotimah, H., Ermiana, I., & Rosyidah, A. N. K. (2021). Pengembangan Multimedia Interaktif Berbasis Macromedia Flash Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis. Progres Pendidikan, 2(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.29303/prospek.v2i1.57

Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Tai, Y., Liu, X., Shen, P., Li, S., Li, J., Huang, F. (2020). Curricularface: Adaptive curriculum learning loss for deep face recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 5900–5909. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR42600.2020.00594

Kaffenberger, M. (2021). Modelling the long-run learning impact of the Covid-19 learning shock: Actions to (more than) mitigate loss. International Journal of Educational Development, 81(2020), 102326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2020.102326

Khasanah, D. W. I., Islam, U., Sunan, N., Surabaya, A., Tarbiyah, F., Keguruan, D. A. N., … Matematika, P. P. (2019). Identifikasi Lubang Konstruksi Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika. Skripsi.

Lestyanto, L. M., Nasution, S. H., Cahyowati, E. T. D., & Kahfi, M. S. (2019). Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep Mahasiswa pada Materi Himpunan dan Defragmentasi Struktur Berpikirnya. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(2), 128–142. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2019.4.2.128-142

Lin, Y., Tseng, C.-L., & Chiang, P.-J. (2017). The Effect of Blended Learning in Mathematics Course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(3), 741–770. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a

Liu, Y. (2019). Using reflections and questioning to engage and challenge online graduate learners in education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-019-0098-z

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters : Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Maulyda, M. A., Erfan, M., & Hidayati, V. R. (2021). Analisis situasi pembelajaran selama pandemi covid-19 di sdn senurus: kemungkinan terjadinya learning loss. Collase, 04(03), 328–336.

Mustagfiroh, S. (2020). Konsep “ Merdeka Belajar †Perspektif Aliran Progresivisme di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 141–147.

Ni’mah, R., Sunismi, & Fathani, A. H. (2018). Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep Matematika Dan Scaffoldingnya. Edudikara: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 162–171.

Pangondian, A. R., Santosa, P. I., & Nugroho, E. (2019). Faktor - Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kesuksesan Pembelajaran Daring Dalam Revolusi Industri 4.0. Sainteks 2019, 56–60.

Priyati, P., & Lygia Mampouw, H. (2018). Pemberian Scaffolding Untuk Siswa Yang Mengalami Kesalahan Dalam Menggambar Grafik Fungsi Kuadrat. JTAM | Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika, 2(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v2i1.293

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., & Guà rdia, L. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis : Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 923–945.

Santoso, T., Cholily, Y. M., & Syaifuddin, M. (2021). An Analysis of Students’ Errors in Completing Essay HOTS Questions Based On Watson’s Criteria Viewed From The Cognitive Style Perspective. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 5(1), 121. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i1.3776

Subanji. (2015). Teori Kesalahan Konstruksi Konsep dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Malang: UM Press.

Subanji, & Nusantara, T. (2013). Karakterisasi Kesalahan Berpikir Siswa dalam Mengonstruksi Konsep Matematika. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 19(2), 208–217.

Sugiono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D Edisi 2. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Utami, Y. P., & Cahyono, D. A. D. (2020). Study At Home: Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Matematika Pada Proses Pembelajaran Daring. Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Realistik, 1(1), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.33365/ji-mr.v1i1.252

Wyrasti, A. F., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Sulandra, I. M. (2018). The Misanalogical Construction of Undergraduate Students in Solving Cognitive Conflict Identification Task. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/3961

Zhao, Y. (2021). Build back better: Avoid the learning loss trap. Prospects, (0123456789). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-021-09544-y

Downloads

Published

2022-01-22

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2022): January

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).