Analisis Kesalahan Penulisan Algoritma Pemrograman Delphi Pada Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UIN Mataram

Authors

  • Rina Mariana Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram
  • Muh Fauzi STMIK Bumigora Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v2i2.711

Keywords:

Algoritma Pemrograman Delphi

Abstract

Riwayat Artikel:

Diterima: 08-07-2018

Disetujui: 20-10-2018

 

Abstrak: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan objek penelitian adalah mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika UIN Mataram yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis bentuk kesalahan yang sering dilakukan oleh mahasiswa dalam menyusun scribs komputasi pada praktikum Delphi. Tim peneliti menggunakan purposive sampling, dengan sampel penelitian berjumlah 139 mahasiswa. Metode pengumpulan data terdiri dari metode observasi, interview, dan dokumentasi.  Kemudian data yang terkumpul dianalisa menggunakan analisa data model Spradley yang terdiri dari: Analisis Doamin, Taksonomi, Komponensial, dan Tema. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berbagai macam bentuk kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh mahasiswa yakni (1) tidak mendeklarasikan (mendefinisikan) variabel yang digunakan dalam rumus atau instruksi; (2) Kesalahan penulisan pada tanda baca, seperti tanda baca titik , koma, titik dua, titik koma, tanda kurung, dan sama dengan; (3) kesalahan penulisan pada huruf  khususnya pada konversi data; dan (4) kesalahan dalam mengkhiri instruksi pemrograman.

Abstract:  This research is a qualitative research with the object of research is the Mathematics Education Department of UIN Mataram students whose purpose is to analyze the forms of errors that are often carried out by students in compiling computational scribs in the Delphi practicum. The research team used purposive sampling, with a sample of 139 students. The method of data collection consists of methods of observation, interviews, and documentation. Then the collected data was analyzed using Spradley model data analysis which consisted of: Domain Analysis, Taxonomy, Componential, and Themes. The results showed that various forms of errors made by students namely (1) did not declare (define) variables used in formulas or instructions; (2) Writing errors in punctuation marks, such as punctuation marks, commas, colons, semicolons, parentheses, and are equal to; (3) writing errors in letters especially in data conversion; and (4) errors in terminating programming instructions.

References

Afifuddin dan Beni Ahmad S. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Amirul Hadi. (1998). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Antony Pranata. (2005). Algoritma dan Pemrograman. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu.

Emzir. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif : Analisis Data. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Lexy J. Moleong. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rinaldi Munir. (2005). Matematika Diskrit Edisi Ketiga. Bandung: Informatika.

Syaharuddin, Vera Mandailina, Yunita Septiana Anwar. (2015). Pengembangan Software Matematika SMP/MTs Berbasis Solutif Menggunakan Borland Delphi. Jurnal Beta, 8(2), 183-192

Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2018-10-30

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2018): October

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).