Reflective Thinking Profile of High School Students in Solving Hots-Type Questions Reviewed from Adversity Quotient

Authors

  • Sumardi Sumardi Mathematics Education Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
  • Anggit Cahyaning Tyas Mathematics Education Study Program, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v6i4.9376

Keywords:

Adversity Quotient, HOTS, Reflective Thinking.

Abstract

The many Adversity Quotient kinds that each individual possesses will have an impact on how they respond to addressing difficulties. The person's efforts to tackle the current difficulties get more difficult as their degree of Adversity Quotient rises.This study's purpose is to describe students' reflective thinking profile in solving HOTS-type questions in terms of level adversity quotient. The subjects of this study, namely three students from class X of senior high school, were taken based on the Adversity Responses Profile (ARP) questionnaire results. The data collection techniques carried out by this study include analysis of test answer results and in-depth interviews. In addition, source triangulation is used for the validity of the data. Data analysis is carried out through five stages: data collection, data reduction, data presentation, data verification, and conclusions. The data table is obtained from the results of the analysis of the answers to the three questions presented in the form of tables based on the components of reflective thinking and problem-solving steps. The research results in this article are three, (1) the reflective thinking profile of students in solving HOTS-type questions can meet the components of reflective thinking and go through the steps of problem-solving Polya: analysis, plan, implement, and evaluation; (2) the reflective thinking profile of students in solving HOTS-type questions cannot meet all the components of reflective thinking, namely the comparing component and through the steps of problem-solving Polya: analysis, plan, implementation, and evaluation. However, at the step of the problem-solving plan, there is one plan that is not by mathematical concepts; and (3) the reflective thinking profile of quitter students in solving HOTS-type problems cannot meet all the components of reflective thinking, namely the contemplating component and not going through all the steps of problem-solving, namely the step of implementing the plan and evaluation. The three types of adversity questions have different reflective thinking profiles according to the criteria of each type.

 

References

Adha, S. M., & Rahaju, E. B. (2020). Profil Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kecerdasan Logis-Matematis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 4(2), 62–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jppms.v4n2.p61-71

Ariestyan, Y., Sunardi, & Kurniati. (2016). Proses Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. KADIKMA:Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.19184/kdma.v7i1.5472

Badjeber, R., & Purwaningrum, J. P. (2018). Pengembangan Higher Order Thinking Skills Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Di Smp. Guru Tua : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.31970/gurutua.v1i1.9

Fuady, A. (2017). Berfikir Reflektif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. JIPMat, 1(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v1i2.1236

Habibatul Izzah, K., & Azizah, M. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Siswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas Iv. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 2(2), 210. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v2i2.17629

Isnaen, N. S. F., & Budiarto, M. T. (2018). Profil Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient. MATHEdunesa, 7(1), 68–73. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/3/article/view/22731

Kartikasari, L., & Kurniasari, I. (2021). Profil Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal PISA Ditinjau dari Kecemasan Matematika. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2878–2895. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v5i3.936

Kholid, M. N., Sadijah, C., Hidayanto, E., Permadi, H., & Firdareza, R. M. F. (2020). Pupils’ Reflective Thinking in Solving Linear Equation System Problem. Journal for the Mathematics Education and Teaching Practices, 1(1), 19–27. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jmetp/issue/55820/740132

Khumairoh, B., Amin, S. M., & Wijayanti, P. (2020). Penalaran Proporsional Siswa Kelas Menengah dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Pedagogia : Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v

Kurniawati, L., Kusumah, Y. S., Sumarmo, U., & Sabandar, J. (2014). Enhancing students’ mathematical intuitive-reflective thinking ability through problem-based learning with hypnoteaching method. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(36), 130–135. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/17480

Lutfiananda, I. M. A., Mardiyana, & Saputro, D. R. S. (2016). Analisis Proses Berpikir Reflektif Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Non Rutin Di Kelas VIII Smp Islamic International School Pesantren Sabilil Muttaqien (IIS PSM) Magetan Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Awal. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(9), 812–823. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/s2math/article/view/9700/7135

Odiba, I. A., & Baba, P. A. (2013). Using reflective thinking skills for education quality improvement in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(16), 196–202.

Raiyn, J., & Tilchin, O. (2015). Higher-Order Thinking Development through Adaptive Problem-based Learning. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.769

Rasyid, M. A., Budiarto, M. T., & Lukito, A. (2017). Profil Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP dalam Pemecahan Masalah Pecahan Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 8(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v8i2.9849

Rhaudyatun, A. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Cornell Note-Taking Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa. https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/33824

Saraswati, P. M. S., & Agustika, G. N. S. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 4(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v4i2.25336

Sari, C. K., Sutopo, S., & Aryuna, D. R. (2016). The Profile of Students’ Thinking in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Adversity Quotient. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 1(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v1i1.1784

Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotoient, Mengubah hambatan menjadi peluang (diterjemahkan oleh t hermaya). Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Suhaji, I. P. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif. Zeta - Math Journal, 5(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.31102/zeta.2020.5.1.8-15

Suharna, H. (2018). Teori berpikir reflektif dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Sutama. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, PTK, Mix Methods, R & D. Sukoharjo: CV Jasmine, 114.

Swastika, A., Kholid, M. N., Nirmala, E., & Maharani, S. (2021). Pupils ’ Reflective Thinking and Self -Efficacy Level for Problem Solving. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(6), 4628–4636. https://www.turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/8448

Yoga, M. (2016). Adversity Quotient: Agar Anak Tak Gampang Menyerah. Solo: Tinta Medina.

Yuliatin, D. eko, & Ismail. (2019). Profil Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan masalah Matematika Model PISA ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 251–259. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/3/article/view/28072

Downloads

Published

2022-10-07

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 4 (2022): October

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish articles in JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).