Pengembangan Selang Logika Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Pada Materi Logika Matematika

Authors

  • Habibi Ratu Perwira Negara UIN Mataram
  • Farah Heniati Santosa Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram
  • Samsul Bahri Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/paedagoria.v8i1.161

Keywords:

Media Pembelajaran, Selang Logika, LKS, Logika Matematika

Abstract

Abstrak: Penelitian pengembangan ini bertujuan mengahasilkan produk berupa media pembelajaran dan LKS pada materi logika Matematika submateri pernyataan majemuk. Pengembangan ini mengadopsi perngembangan 4D (Define, Design Develop, dan Disseminate) yang dikembangkan oleh S. Thiagarajan, Dorothy S. Semmel, dan Melvyn I. Semmel. Hasil validasi oleh 2 ahli terhadap media pembelajaran selang logika diperoleh rata-rata sebesar 3.833 atau dalam kategori “cukup validâ€. Sedangkan hasil validasi terhadap LKS  diperoleh sebesar 3.649 atau dalam kategori “cukup validâ€. Pada uji coba terbatas, rata-rata respon siswa terhadap media pembelajaran selang logika sebesar 79% atau dalam kategori “Baikâ€, sedangkan rata-rata respon siswa terhadap LKS sebesar 76% atau dalam kategori “Baikâ€. Selanjutnya hasil uji coba lapangan diperoleh rata-rata respon siswa terhadap media pembelajaran selang logika sebesar 83% atau dalam kategori “Sangat Baikâ€, sedangkan terhadap LKS, rata-rata respon siswa sebesar 79% atau dalam ketegori “Baikâ€. Sehingga kualiatas hasil pengembangan media pembelajan selang logika adalah “Sangat Baik†dan kualiatas LKS pada meteri logika adalah “Baikâ€.

Abstract:  This development research aims to produce products in the form of learning media and LKS on the subject of mathematic logic sub content compound statements. This development adopts the development of 4D (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate) developed by S. Thiagarajan, Dorothy S. Semmel, and Melvyn I. Semmel. Validation results by two experts on learning media logic hose obtained an average of 3,833 or in the category of "quite valid". While the result of validation to LKS obtained equal to 3,649 or in category "enough valid". In the limited trial, the average student response to learning media logic hole is 79% or in the "Good" category, while the average student response to LKS is 76% or in the "Good" category. Furthermore, the result of field experiment obtained average student response to learning media of logic hose equal to 83% or in category "Very Good", where was to LKS, average student response equal to 79% or in category "Good". So, the quality of the development of logic hose learning media was "Very Good" and the quality of LKS on logic subject was "Good".

Downloads

Published

2017-04-30

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2017): April

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.

Authors who publish with Paedagoria : Jurnal Kajian, Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kependidikan agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.