ANALISIS TINGKAT KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KREATIF SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN MASALAH OPEN-ENDED PADA MATERI BANGUN DATAR BAGI SISWA KELAS VIII SMP KRISTEN 02 SALATIGA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/pendekar.v1i1.244Keywords:
Kemampuan berpikir kreatif Masalah open-ended Bangun datarAbstract
Abstrak: Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah open-ended pada materi bangun datar bagi siswa kelas VIII SMP Kristen 02 Salatiga. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 3 orang siswa kelas VIII SMP Kristen 02 Salatiga yang memiliki kemampuan matematika tinggi, sedang, dan rendah. Subjek penelitian ini diambil dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data berupa tes dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa: 1) Subjek berkemampuan matematika tinggi mencapai tingkat 4 (sangat kreatif) dimana indikator kelancaran, keluwesan dan kebaruan dipenuhi; 2) Subjek berkemampuan matematika sedang mencapai tingkat 3 (kreatif) dimana subjek dapat memenuhi 2 indikator yaitu kelancaran dan keluwesan; 3) Subjek berkampuan matematika rendah mencapai tingkat 2 (cukup kreatif) dimana subjek hanya memenuhi indikator keluwesan.
Â
Abstract: Â The type of this research is qualitative research that aims to analyze the level of students creative thinking ability in solving open-ended problem in geometric shapes material for VIII students of SMP Kristen 02 Salatiga. The subject of this research is 3 students of class VIII SMP Kristen 02 Salatiga who have high, medium, and low math skills. The subject of this research is taken by using purposive sampling technique. Data collection techniques in the form of tests and interviews. Based on the results of the analysis can be concluded that: 1) subjects with high math achievement level 4 (very creative) where indicators of fluency, flexibility, and novelty are met; 2) Subjects capable of achieving mathematics level 3 (creative) in which the subject can meet 2 indicators of fluency and flexibility; 3) Subjects with low mathematics have reached level 2 (creative enough) where the subject only meets the flexibility indicator.References
Miles, Mattew B dan A. Michael Huberman. 2007. Analisis data Kualitatif buku sumber tentang metode-metode baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
Muhsinin,U . 2011. Pendekatan open-ended pada pembelajaran matematika. Edu-Math; Vol. 4.
Munandar, U. 2009. Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta
Noer. 2009. Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis dan Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Masalah open-ended. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, volume 5. No 1.
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering Creativity through Instruction Rich in Mathematical 12 Problem Solving and Problem Posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik (ZDM) – The International Journal on Mathematics Education. (Online). Tersedia: http://www.emis.de/journals/ZDM/zdm973a3.pdf. ISSN 1615-679X. Diakses 25 februari 2017
Siswono, T.Y.E. 2011. Level Student’s Creative Thinking in Classroom, Academic Journal.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta.
Suherman, E. Et al. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung : JICA.
Yamin, M. 2013. Strategi dan Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Referensi GP Press Group
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish articles in International Journal on Student Research in Education, Science, and Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright of the article and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a CC-BY-SA or The Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).