Empowering Leadership Terhadap Kinerja Pekerjaan, Keterlibatan Kerja, Dan Keterlibatan Kerja Kreatif: Peran Mediasi Pemberdayaan Psikologis
Keywords:
Empowering Leadership, Keterlibatan Kerja, Keterlibatan Kerja Kreatif, Kinerja Pekerjaan, Pemberdayaan PsikologisAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh dari empowering leadership terhadap kinerja pekerjaan, keterlibatan kerja, keterlibatan kerja kreatif, dan pemberdayaan psikologis sebagai mediasi. Review literatur dilakukan dalam upaya untuk mengidentifikasi variabel-variabel yang digunakan untuk membangun model konseptual. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah menggunakan pendekatan metode kuantitatif dengan cara menyebarkan kuesioner melalui platform digital. Data yang digunakan pada penelitian ini diperoleh 100 responden dari seorang karyawan IT. Metode analisis menggunakan SEM-PLS dengan aplikasi SmartPLS versi 4. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa seluruh hipotesisi didukung dalam penelitian ini.References
Agustini, P. (2021, September 12). aptika.kominfo.go.id. Retrieved from aptika.kominfo.go.id: https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2021/09/warganet-meningkat-indonesia-perlu-tingkatkan-nilai-budaya-di-internet/
Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945-955.
Albrecht, S. L., & Andreetta, M. (2011). The influence of empowering leadership, empowerment and engagement on affective commitment and turnover intentions in community health service workers: Test of a model. Leadership in Health Services, 24(3), 228–237.
Alessandri, G., Consiglio, C., Luthans, F., & Borgogni, L. (2018). Testing a dynamic model of the impact of psychological capital on work engagement and job performance. Career Development International, 23(1), 33-47.
Alexandra, L. G. (2013, November 11-12). Organizational learning and performance: conceptual model. Paper presented at the 7th International Management Conference on “New Management for the New Economy.
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: a componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357-376.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.
Amor, A. M., V_azquez, J. A., & Fa_ı~na, J. A. (2020). Transformational leadership and work engagement: exploring the mediating role of structural empowerment. European Management Journal, 38(1), 169-178.
Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015a). Linking Empowering Leadership to Job Satisfaction, Work Effort, and Creativity: The Role of Self-Leadership and Psychological Empowerment. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304–323.
Angelia, D. (2022, April 16). goodstats.id. Retrieved from goodstats.id: https://goodstats.id/article/7-perusahaan-indonesia-dengan-karyawan-paling-bahagia-q4-2021-sc2EE
Ariani, A. P. (2014). Aplikasi Metodologi Penelitian Kebidanan Kesehatan. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika.
Audenaert, M., & DeCramer, A. (2018). When empowering leadership fosters creative performance: the role of problem-solving demands and creative personality. Journal of Management and Organization, 24(1), 4-18.
Bakker, A. B., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2013). Creativity and charisma among female leaders: The role of resources and work engagement. The International Journal of Human Resources Management, 24, 2760–2779.
Bandura, A. (1982). he assessment and predictive generality of self-percepts of efficacy. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 13(3), 195-199.
Bhatnagar, J. (2012). Management of innovation: Role of psychological empowerment, work engagement and turnover intention in the Indian context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(5), 928-951.
Darvishmotevalia, M., & Ali, F. (2020). Job insecurity, subjective well-being and job performance: the moderating role of psychological capital. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 87(10246), 1-10.
Faulkner, J., & Laschinger, H. (2008). The effects of structural and psychological empowerment on perceived respect in acute care nurses. Journal of nursing management, 16(2), 214-221.
Fong, K. H., & Snape, E. (2015). Empowering leadership, psychological empowerment and employee outcomes: testing a multi-level mediating model. British Journal of Management, 26(1), 126-138.
Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: a matter of degree. Academy of Management Perspectives, 9(3), 21-29.
Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The leadership quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.
Gyu Park, J., Sik Kim, J., Yoon, S. W., & Joo, B. K. (2017). The effects of empowering leadership on psychological well-being and job engagement: The mediating role of psychological capital. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 350-367.
Hakanen, J. J., Perhoniemi, R., & Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008). Positive gain spirals at work: From job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 78–91.
House, R. J., & Dessler, G. (1974). A path-goal theory of leadership: some post hoc and a priori tests. In I. J. Larson (Ed.), Contingency approaches to leadership (pp. 29-55). Carbondale: IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Humborstad, S. W., Nerstad, C. L., & Dysvik, A. (2014). Empowering leadership, employee goal orientations and work performance: a competing hypothesis approach. Personnel Review, 43(2), 246-271.
Jose, G., & Mampilly, S. R. (2015). Relationships among perceived supervisor support, psychological empowerment and employee engagement in Indian workplaces. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 30(3), 231-250.
Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 341.
Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. (2009). Alive and creating: the mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 785-804.
Klerk, D. S., & Stander, M. W. (2014). Leadership empowerment behavior, work engagement and turnover intention: the role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Positive Management,, 5(3), 28-45.
Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704.
Lidwina, A. (2021, Juni 4). databoks.katadata.co.id. Retrieved from databoks.katadata.co.id: https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/06/04/penggunaan-e-commerce-indonesia-tertinggi-di-dunia
Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395.
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 607-634.
Özaralli, N. (2015). Linking empowering leader to creativity: the moderating role of psychological (felt) empowerment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 366-376.
Park, J. G., Kim, J. S., Yoon, S. W., & Joo, B. K. (2017). The effects of empowering leadership on psychological well-being and job engagement: the mediating role of psychological capital. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 38(3), 350-367.
Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518-528.
Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63(11), 1743-1770.
Rosing, K., Frese, M., & Bausch, A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The leadership quarterly, 22(5), 956-974.
Schaufeli, W. B., Saalanova, M., Gonz_alez-Rom_a, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personaland contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management,, 30, 933–958.
Simbula, S., & Guglielmi, D. (2013). I am engaged, I feel good, and I go the extra-mile: Reciprocal relationships between work engagement and consequences. Revista de PsicologÃa del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29(3), 117-125.
Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sulistiani , W. (2018, August 20). chicmanagers.com. Retrieved from https://chicmanagers.com/pentingnya-membangun-hubungan-emosional-dengan-karyawan/
Weisberg, R. W. (1988). Problem solving and creativity. In The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (in Sternberg, R.J. ed., pp. 148-176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: the influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
