About the Journal
Focus and Scope
Jurnal Civicus merupakan salah satu jurnal yang dikelola oleh Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PPKn) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram dengan kajian publikasi tentang hasil penelitian dan pengabdian kepada masyarakat yang berkaitan dengan:
- Ilmu Social, Ilmu Hukum, Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan;
- Teori pembelajaran, pengembangan pembelajaran, penerapan pembelajaran, dan model-model pembelajaran Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (PPKn);
Publication Frequency
Jurnal Civicus terbit dua kali dalam setahun yakni bulan Maret dan September, dengan jumlah 5-10 artikel pada setiap nomor terbitan.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Peer Review Process
Setiap artikel yang dikirimkan ditinjau secara independen oleh setidaknya dua peer-reviewer (double blind review). Keputusan untuk publikasi, amandemen, atau penolakan didasarkan pada laporan/rekomendasi mereka. Setelah ditinjau, akan ada empat jenis keputusan editor berdasarkan rekomendasi reviewer:
- Terima: Pengajuan akan diterima tanpa revisi.
- Revisi: Pengajuan akan diterima setelah perubahan kecil telah dibuat.
- Submit kembali: Pengajuan harus dikerjakan kembali, tetapi dengan perubahan signifikan, dapat diterima. Akan tetapi, ini membutuhkan tinjauan putaran kedua.
- Ditolak: Pengajuan tidak akan dipublikasikan dalam jurnal.
Publication Frequency
Jurnal Civicus terbit dua kali dalam setahun yakni bulan Maret dan September. Jumlah artikel yang diterima antara 6-15 paper.
Publication Charges
Biaya Submit
Pengiriman Artikel: 0,00 (IDR). Penulis TIDAK diharuskan membayar biaya pengiriman artikel.
Biaya Pemrosesan
Setiap makalah yang diterima (maksimum 6 penulis) publikasi di Jurnal Civicus dikenai biaya IDR300.000. Biaya ini digunakan untuk proofreading akhir, pemeriksaan plagiarisme, DOI, XML galley, satu salinan jurnal print-out, dan proses pengeditan. Ini di luar biaya pengiriman ke institusi atau alamat penulis.
Plagiarism Check
Penulis harus memastikan bahwa mereka telah menulis karya asli, dan jika penulis telah menggunakan karya dan / atau kata-kata orang lain, mereka harus mengutipnya dengan benar sesuai dengan aturan yang berlaku. Seorang Penulis tidak boleh mempublikasikan teks yang menggambarkan dasar penelitian yang sama di lebih dari satu jurnal atau publikasi utama. Kirim naskah yang sama ke jurnal yang lebih lengkap yang disampaikan yang tidak etis dan tidak dapat diterima. Editor akan menjalankan pemeriksaan plagiarisme menggunakan Pemeriksa Plagiarisme CheckerX untuk artikel yang dikirimkan sebelum dikirim ke pengulas. Kami tidak memproses konten yang dijiplak. Jika sebuah artikel memiliki lebih dari 30% plagiarisme berdasarkan hasil pemeriksaan, kami akan mengirimkan kembali artikel tersebut kepada penulis untuk direvisi untuk konten yang dijiplak.
Publication Ethics
Publication decisions
The editor is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published.
The editor may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
Â
Reporting standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors.
The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Journal History
Jurnal Civicus pertama kali digagas pada bulan September 2013. Kemudian Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) mengeluarkan SK no. 0005.159/JI.3.2/SK.ISSN/2013.09 - 30 September 2013 yang menyatakan bahwa Civicus mulai terbit pada edisi Vol. 1, No. 1, September 2013. Dalam proses menuju versi elektronik, untuk berkas (paper) tahun 2013-2015 tidak ditemukan, hal ini karena ada perubahan pada susunan pengelola Civicus. Sedangkan mulai Volume 4 tahun 2016 sudah online di http://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/CIVICUS.
