Sosio-Kultural Tradisi Wedi Ruha dalam Perkawinan Masyarakat Manggarai
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/civicus.v11i2.21481Keywords:
Sosio-kultural, Tradisi, Wedi Ruha, PerkawinanAbstract
Masyarakat manggarai merupakan komunitas local yang memiliki beragam budaya, tradisi, adat istiadat yang kompleks dalam kegiatan social kemasyarakatan. Namun, Sebagian masyarakat tidak memahami tradisi yang hidup sejak nenek moyang terdahulu yang hingga saat ini aktif dan masyarakat selalu melakukan ritualisasi sebagai bentuk pelestarian budaya local dalam perkawinan. Tujuan kajian dalam artikel ini adalah untuk menjelaskan sosio-kultural tradisi wedi ruha dalam perkawinan masyarakat Manggarai. Penelitian ini study etnhografi. Subyek penelitian dalam penelitian ini adalah berjumlah 6 orang yang terdiri atas 1 tokoh adat, 1 tokoh agama, 1 tokoh pemuda, 1 kepala desa dan 2 orang pelaku budaya wedu ruha. Pengumpulan data menggunakan observasi, interview mendalam dan analisis dokumentasi. Analisis data menggunakan tahapa pengumpulan data, reduksi data, verifikasi data, dan penarikan simpulan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai budaya dalam kebudayaan Wedi Ruha dalam masyarakat Manggarai telah berkembang lama di masyarakat desa, sehingga adanya tradisi wedi tuha ini memiliki nilai-nilai sakral dalam perkawinan adat, nilai agama, nilai kesusilaan, dan nilai kebahagiaan. Nilai sociocultural dalam budaya local wedi ruha dalam Masyarakat manggarai adalah nilai kebersamaan, nilai gotong royong, dan nilai kebahagiaan. Sosio-kultural dalam tradisi perkawinan masyarakat manggarai memiliki kontribusi pada aspek kebersamaan, gotong-royong dan kebahagiaan.Â
Â
The Manggarai community is a local community that has a variety of cultures, traditions, and complex customs in social activities. However, some people do not understand the traditions that they have lived since their previous ancestors who are active until now, and the community always performs ritualization to preserve local culture in marriage. The purpose of the study in this article is to explain the sociocultural tradition of Wedi Ruha in the marriage of the Manggarai community. This research is an ethnographic study. The research subjects in this study were six people consisting of 1 traditional figure, one religious’ figure, one youth figure, one village head, and two Wedi Ruha cultural actors. Data collection using observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation analysis. Data analysis uses data collection, reduction, verification, and conclusion stages. The results of this study show that cultural values in Wedi Ruha culture in Manggarai society have long developed in village communities. Hence, this wide tradition has sacred values in traditional marriages and religious, moral, and happiness values. Sociocultural values in the local culture of Wedi Ruha in the Manggarai Society are the value of togetherness, mutual cooperation, and happiness. Sociocultural, the marriage tradition of the Manggarai community has contributed to aspects of togetherness, cooperation, and happiness
References
Y. Liunokas, F. Bustan, and E. Huan, “The Forms of Marriage in Manggarai Society,†Int. J. Arts Soc. Sci., 2023.
Y. S. Lon, “The Legality of Marriage According to Customary, Religion and State Laws: Impacts on Married Couples and Children in Manggarai,†J. Din. Huk., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 302–317, 2019.
A. Imun, B. Martono, and I. Sugianto, “The Meaning of Cultural Signs and Values in The Manggarai Traditional Marriage Tradition, North Satarmese District,†J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Bus., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 515–524, 2023.
Y. S. Lon and F. Widyawati, “Customary law before religion and state laws regarding marriage In Manggarai, Eastern Indonesia,†J. Cita Huk., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 93–110, 2021.
D. Antonius and Y. Wahyu, “Nempung Messages in Communication Manggarai Traditional Marriage: Case Study of Three Clay Events on Communication Manggarai Traditional Marriage in Kupang City, NTT, Indonesia,†Open J. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 03, p. 265, 2020.
V. A. Gunawan, “Marriage and Family Formation in the Contemporary Manggaraian Culture (Flores, Indonesia),†Stud. Warm., vol. 59, pp. 271–283, 2022.
Y. P. F. Erfiani, I. W. Simpen, I. M. Netra, and N. L. N. S. Malini, “Ontological metaphor in traditional marriage discourse of manggarai speech community-east indonesia: Cultural linguistic perspective,†Int. J. Lang. Cult., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2023.
S. Rejeki, I. Isnaini, and H. Heryanto, “Budaya Wedi Ruha (Injak Telur): Study Proses dan Pelaksanaan dalam Perkawinan Masyarakat Manggarai,†Civ. Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidik. Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2023.
S. O. Manullang, S. Syarifuddin, M. N. Shidiq, I. Rahman, and S. Sahrul, “Tradisi Perkawinan Bersyarat dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam,†J. Pendidik. Tambusai, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 6558–6568, 2023.
D. Darmiyanto and A. Arsyad, “Konsep Belis dalam Tradisi Perkawinan Masyarakat di Manggarai Timur; Perspektif Perbandingan Mazhab Hanafi dan al-Syafi’i,†Shautuna J. Ilm. Mhs. Perbandingan Maz. dan Huk., 2021.
N. Dafiq, “Dinamika psikologis pada masyarakat Manggarai terkait budaya belis,†Wawasan Kesehat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 98–104, 2018.
P. H. Musbahar, “Pandangan Masyarakat Terhadap Fenomena Tingginya Belis (Mahar) Perkawinan (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Borong Kabupaten Manggarai Timur, Flores Nusa Tenggara Timur,†J. Hikmatina, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 37–43, 2019.
H. Spencer, “The social organism,†Westminster Rev., vol. 73, no. 143, pp. 90–121, 1860.
A. Comte, The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte. Blanchard, 1858.
T. Parsons, Talcott Parsons on institutions and social evolution: selected writings. University of Chicago Press, 1985.
A. R. Turama, “Formulasi teori fungsionalisme struktural Talcott Parsons,†EUFONI J. Lang. Lit. Cult. Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 58–69, 2020.
G. H. Mead, “The genesis of the self and social control,†Int. J. Ethics, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 251–277, 1925.
H. Blummer, “Society as symbolic interaction: Human Behavior and Social Processes,†Routledge, pp. 179–192, 1962.
A. M. Miles & Huberman and J. Saldana, “Qualitative data analysis,†Transl. by Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press, A Methods Sourcebook, 2014.
J. Narung and T. Permadi, “Kajian Semiotika Dalam Tuturan Upacara Pernikahan Adat Masyarakat Flores Kabupaten Manggarai Tengah Nusa Tenggara Timur,†in Seminar Internasional Riksa Bahasa, 2019.
R. M. Williams, “American society: A sociological interpretation (3rd Edn.),†New York Knopf., 1970.
S. H. Schwartz, “A theory of cultural values and some implications for work,†Appl. Psychol., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 23–47, 1999.
S. H. Schwartz, “Basic human values: Their content and structure across countries,†Valores e Comport. nas Organ., no. nd, pp. 21–55, 2005.
S. H. Schwartz, “Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries,†in Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, Elsevier, 1992, pp. 1–65.
S. H. Schwartz, M. Verkasalo, A. Antonovsky, and L. Sagiv, “Value priorities and social desirability: Much substance, some style,†Br. J. Soc. Psychol., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 3–18, 1997.
P. E. Tetlock, “A value pluralism model of ideological reasoning.,†J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 50, no. 4, p. 819, 1986.
J. P. Lantolf, “Introducing sociocultural theory,†Sociocult. theory Second Lang. Learn., vol. 1, pp. 1–26, 2000.
J. V Wertsch, N. Minick, and F. J. Arns, “The creation of context in joint problem-solving.,†1984.
M. M. Jupir, “Implementasi kebijakan pariwisata berbasis kearifan lokal (studi di Kabupaten Manggarai Barat),†J. Indones. Tour. Dev. Stud., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 28–38, 2013.
M. M. Mahri, A. B. J. Armandany, L. Ragut, and Y. Endi, “Sakralitas Perkawinan Cangkang Dalam Adat Manggarai Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Kitab Hukum Kanonik,†Dharmasmrti J. Ilmu Agama dan Kebud., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 25–34, 2022.
B. Jagom, “Upacara Teing Ngasang dalam Tradisi Masyarakat Manggarai dan Sakramen Baptis (Sebuah Pengantar Studi Perbandingan Inisiasi),†Fides et Ratio, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 17–26, 2020.
M. J. Adon and G. Avi, “Konsep Religiositas Masyarakat Suku Cepang Manggarai-NTT dalam Simbolisme Ritus Da’de,†Dialog, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 71–85, 2023.
