Developing of Four-Tier Diganostic Test to Identify Test Profile on Acid and Base Materials

Authors

  • Isna Rezkia Lukman Departement of Chemistry Education, Malikussaleh University
  • Ratna Unaida Departement of Chemistry Education, Malikussaleh University
  • Fakhrah Fakhrah Departement of Chemistry Education, Malikussaleh University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v5i1.6359

Keywords:

Misconceptions, 4D Models, Acid and Base

Abstract

Misconceptions that occur continuously and protracted can interfere with the learning process. Therefore, educators must be able to identify precisely the misconceptions that occur. This research was conducted to find out the implementation of four-tier diagnostic tests in analyzing the misconceptions of students in high school in North Aceh regency and understand the results of analysis of the comprehension level of learners' concepts, whether they Scientific conception, Lack of knowledge, and misconception. Four-tier diagnostic test instrument has been developed by adapting 4D models (Define, Design, Development and Disseminate). Through these steps, the four-tier diagnostic test instrument is produced that is valid through content validation with content-validity coefficient of 0.89 and an average aspect of 4.5 and includes an excellent category. On average, the overall profile of learners got 44.47% who Scientific conception, 44.03% Lack of knowledge and 11.50% who experienced misconceptions in acids and bases materials. The implication of this study is that educators can analyze scientific conception, lack of knowledge and misconceptions on acids and bases materials in learners, and use suitable learning methods so that the misconception is not repeated.

 

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Akerson, V. (2009). The influence of metacognitive training on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(16), 2161–2184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802563324

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients For Analyzing The Reliability And Validity of Ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurment, 45.

Bevir, M. (2003). Notes Toward an Analysis of Conceptual Change. Social Epistemology, 17(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269112032000114831

Diani, R., Alfin, J., Anggraeni, Y. M., Mustari, M., & Fujiani, D. (2019). Four-Tier Diagnostic Test with Certainty of Response Index on the Concepts of Fluid. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012078

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2004). Educational Psychology: Windows, Classroom. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Firdaus, A., Samhati, S., & Suyanto, E. (2014). Analisis Kelayakan Isi Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Terbitan Erlangga Kelas VII SMP/MTs. 1, 1–12.

Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: Focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition. Educational Research, 42(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800363773

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Jubaedah, D. S., Kaniawati, I., Suyana, I., Samsudin, A., & Suhendi, E. (2017). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Berformat Four-Tier Untuk Mengidentifikasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF 2017, VI(October), 35–40.

Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3

Kartikasari, Y., Widodo, M., & Karomani. (2015). Kelayakan Isi Dan Bahasa Pada Buku Teks Bupena Bahasa Indonesia Kelas VII. Jurnal Kata (Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya), 1–9.

Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2003). Individual and Sociocultural Views of Learning in Science Education. Science and Education, 12(1), 91–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022665519862

Lestari, D., Handayani, D., Darussyamsu, R., & Armen, A. (2019). Identification Students’ Misconceptions of Class VIII SMPN 21 Padang in the Skeletal Systems of Organism by Using CRI Technique. Jurnal Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 4(1), 135. https://doi.org/10.24036/apb.v4i1.5470

Macbeth, D. (2000). On an actual apparatus for conceptual change. Science Education, 84(2), 228–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<228::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-3

Martin, R., Sexton, C., Franklin, T., Gerlovich, J., & McElroy, D. (2002). Teaching Science for all Children: Methods for Conctructing Understanding. Allyn and Bacon.

McDermott, L. C. (2006). Preparing K-12 teachers in physics: Insights from history, experience, and research. American Journal of Physics, 74(9), 758–762. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2209243

Mudau, A. V. (2013). Teaching Difficulties from Interactions and Discourse in a Science Classroom. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 3(3), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p113

Novick, S., & Nussbaum, J. (1981). Pupils’ understanding of the particulate nature of matter: A crossâ€age study. Science Education, 65(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730650209

Qurrota, A., & Nuswowati, M. (2018). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Tes Diagnostic Multiple Choice Berbantuan Cri (Certainty of Response Index). Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 12(1), 2108–2117.

Suparno. (2013). Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep Pendidikan Fisik. Grafindo.

Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan tes diagnostik dalam pembelajaran. Grafindo.

Venville, G. (2004). Young children learning about living things: A case study of conceptual change from ontological and social perspectives. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 449–480. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20011

Wardany, K., & Anjarwati, S. (2020). Kelayakan Instrumen Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skills pada Materi Lingkungan. IISEJ : Ndonesian Science Education Journal, 1(3), 226–237.

Wilantika, N., Khoiri, N., & Hidayat, S. (2018). Pengembangan Penyusunan Instrumen Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Untuk Mengungkap Miskonsepsi Materi Sistem Ekskresi Di SMA Negeri 1 Mayong Jepara. Jurnal Phenomenon, 08(2), 200–214.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-13

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): April

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.

Authors who publish with IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.