Cyber-Physical System and Curriculum Heutagogy Implementation in Higher Education for Creating 4.0 Generation

Authors

  • Hendro Prasetyono Department of Economics Education, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Ira Pratiwi Ramdayana Department of Indonesian Language Education, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI
  • Laila Desnaranti Department of Economics Education, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v5i1.7971

Keywords:

Heutagogy, Cyber-Physical System, higher education, literature review.

Abstract

Higher education management must change its management model because the student's current needs in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 era are very diverse and the demand from the industrial world is more specific. This situation required a new approach in learning that can meet the students learning needs, therefore, can generate higher education graduates that have the capability, not competencies. This article is compiled based on the results of thoughts supported by a literature review using content analysis based on the results obtained from 58 articles that were published between 1999 and 2020. The universities can implement heutagogy in the curriculum which is supported by the cyber-physical system in learning. This is causing the students to be able to choose scientific competence they want independently with learning across disciplines for occupying certain ability. The cyber system development in higher education is used to assist the online learning process and as an administrator in supporting learning activities. The cyber-physical system refers to the physical things and the campus atmosphere felt by the students.

 

References

Agonács, N., & Matos, J. F. (2019). Understanding language MOOC learners: The issue of capability development. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(11), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V14I11.10205

Akram, A., Daud, M. Z., Farzana, R., Joha, M. G. M., & Khan, R. (2016). Structuring Quality Education by Proposing Physical Infrastructure of a Medical School. Education in Medicine Journal, 8(3), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.5959/eimj.v8i3.449

Albert, S., & Grzeda, M. (2015). Reflection in Strategic Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 39(5), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914564872

Alenezi, A. (2017). Checking on preferential choices of e-learning & learning: A case study of Northern Border University, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(5), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i05.6790

Alguliyev, R., Imamverdiyev, Y., & Sukhostat, L. (2018). Cyber-physical systems and their security issues. Computers in Industrial, 100(April), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.04.017

Anderson, L., Mason, K., Hibbert, P., & Rivers, C. (2017). Management education in turbulent times. Journal of Management Education, 41(2), 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916682208

Baena, F., Guarin, A., Mora, J., Sauza, J., & Retat, S. (2017). Learning Factory: The Path to Industrial 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.022

Benešová, A., & Tupa, J. (2017). Requirements for Education and Qualification of People in Industrial 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(June), 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.366

Bhoyrub, J., Hurley, J., Neilson, G. R., Ramsay, M., & Smith, M. (2010). Heutagogy: An alternative practice based learning approach. Nurse Education in Practice, 10(6), 322–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2010.05.001

Canning, N., & Callan, S. (2010). Heutagogy: Spirals of Reflection to Empower Learners in Higher Education. Reflective Practice, 11(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623940903500069

Canter, M., & Brumar, C. I. (2011). Transdisciplinary Niches Fostering Lifelong Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 636–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.120

Chan, C. K. Y., Fong, E. T. Y., Luk, L. Y. Y., & Ho, R. (2017). A review of literature on challenges in the development and implementation of generic competencies in higher education curriculum. International Journal of Educational Development, 57(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.08.010

Copaci, I. A., & Rusu, A. S. (2015). A Profile Outline of Higher Education E-Tutoring Programs for the Digital-Native Student – Literature Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209(July), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.270

Davis, L., & Hase, S. (1999). Developing capable employees: The work activity briefing. Journal of Workplace Learning, 11(8), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/13665629910300432

Dehghani, M., Pakmehr, H., & Sani, H. J. (2011). Managerial Challenges of Curriculum Implementation in Higher Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2003–2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.043

Dixit, S., Mandal, S. N., Thanikal, J. V., & Saurabh, K. (2019). Evolution of studies in construction productivity: A systematic literature review (2006–2017). Ain Shams Engineering Journal, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2018.10.010

Eastwood, J. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2013). Teachers’ implementation of a game-based biotechnology curriculum. Computers and Education, 66, 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.003

Faqihi, B., Daoudi, N., & Ajhoun, R. (2018). Design of an intelligent educational resource production system. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(12), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i12.8914

Fitz, T., Theiler, M., & Smarsly, K. (2019). A metamodel for cyber-physical systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 41(December 2018), 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2019.100930

Graessler, I., & Poehler, A. (2019). Human-centric design of cyber-physical production systems. Procedia CIRP, 84, 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.199

Hase, S, & Kenyon, C. (2001). Moving from Andragogy to Heutagogy: Implications for VET. Proceedings of Research to Reality: Putting VET Research to Work, January 2001, 1–8.

Hase, Stewart. (2012). Heutagogy and e-learning in the workplace: some challenges and opportunities. Journal of Applied Research in Workplace E-Learning, 1(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.5043/impact.13

Hase, Stewart, & Kenyon, C. (2007). Semantic Play and Possibility Invited Contribution Heutagogy: A Child of Complexity Theory. An International Journal of Complexity and Education, 4(1), 111–118. www.complexityandeducation.ca

Henshaw, M., & Deka, L. (2018). Transportation Cyber-Physical System as a Specialised Education Stream. In Transportation Cyber-Physical Systems. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-814295-0.00009-5

Jensen, J. C., Lee, E., & Seshia, S. (2013). Virtualizing Cyber-Physical Systems: Bringing CPS to Online Education. Proc. First Workshop on CPS Education (CPS-Ed), 1–5. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Virtualizing Cyber-Physical Systems: Bringing CPS to Online Education&btnG=&hl=en&num=20&as_sdt=0%2C22 VN - readcube.com

Joshua Earnest, Fr. Francis E. de Melo, S. . (2011). Competency-Based Engineering Curricula – an Innovative Approach. International Conference on Engineering Education, 1–18. http://www.ineer.org/Events/ICEE2001/Proceedings/papers/439.pdf

Lafuente-Ruiz-de-Sabando, A., Zorrilla, P., & Forcada, J. (2018). A Review of Higher Education Image and Reputation Literature: Knowledge Gaps and A Research Agenda. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2017.06.005

Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industrial 4.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4

Lawlor, O., Moss, M., Kibler, S., Carson, C., Bond, S., & Bogosyan, S. (2013). Search and rescue robots for integrated research and education in Cyber-Physical Systems. Proceedings - 2013 7th IEEE International Conference on e-Learning in Industrial Electronics, ICELIE 2013, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELIE.2013.6701279

Lim, C. L., Jaya, S., Jalil, H. A., & Saad, W. Z. (2020). Peer Learning , Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement in Blended Learning Courses : A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 110–125.

Liu, Y., Deng, L., Gao, N., & Sun, X. (2019). A reliability assessment method of cyber physical distribution system. Energy Procedia, 158, 2915–2921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.951

Lund Dean, K., & Fornaciari, C. J. (2014). The 21st-Century Syllabus: Tips for Putting Andragogy Into Practice. Journal of Management Education, 38(5), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562913504764

Mohammad, S., Siang, T. C., Osman, S., Jamaluddin, N. Y., Alfu, N. A. M., & Huei, L. Y. (2019). A proposed heutagogy framework for structural steel design in civil engineering curriculum. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(24), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i24.12091

Motyl, B., Baronio, G., Uberti, S., Speranza, D., & Filippi, S. (2017). How will Change the Future Engineers’ Skills in the Industrial 4.0 Framework? A Questionnaire Survey. Procedia Manufacturing, 11(June), 1501–1509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.282

Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018a). Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 -The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005

Mourtzis, D., Vlachou, E., Dimitrakopoulos, G., & Zogopoulos, V. (2018b). Cyber- Physical Systems and Education 4.0 -The Teaching Factory 4.0 Concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.005

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and M. 2016. (2016). A 21st Century Cyber-Physical Systems Education. In The National Academies Press. THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS. https://doi.org/10.17226/23686

Oks, S. J., Jalowski, M., Fritzsche, A., & Möslein, K. M. (2019). Cyber-physical modeling and simulation: A reference architecture for designing demonstrators for industrial cyber-physical systems. Procedia CIRP, 84, 257–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2019.04.239

Ozruso-Haggiag, S. G., & Tabach, M. (2018). Between the implemented and the attained curriculum: The case of strategies for solving linear equations. International Journal of Educational Research, 92(July), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.09.003

Pereira, A. C., & Romero, F. (2017). A review of the meanings and the implications of the Industrial 4.0 concept. Procedia Manufacturing, 13, 1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.032

Rauch, E., Linder, C., & Dallasega, P. (2019). Anthropocentric perspective of production before and within Industrial 4.0. Computers and Industrial Engineering, xxx(xxxx), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.018

Rauen, T. R. S., Lezana, Ã. G. R., & da Silva, V. (2015). Environmental Management: An Overview in Higher Education Institutions. Procedia Manufacturing, 3(Ahfe), 3682–3688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.785

Rohayani, A. H. H., Kurniabudi, & Sharipuddin. (2015). A Literature Review: Readiness Factors to Measuring e-Learning Readiness in Higher Education. Procedia Computer Science, 59(Iccsci), 230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.564

Santos, C., Mehrsai, A., Barros, A. C., Araújo, M., & Ares, E. (2017). Towards Industrial 4.0: an overview of European strategic roadmaps. Procedia Manufacturing, 13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.093

Shubina, I., & Kulakli, A. (2019). Pervasive learning and technology usage for creativity development in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9067

Singh, I., Centea, D., & Elbestawi, M. (2019). IoT, IIoT and Cyber-Physical Systems Integration in the SEPT Learning Factory. Procedia Manufacturing, 31, 116–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.019

Talati, J. J. (2014). Lifelong Learning: Established Concepts and Evolving Values. Arab Journal of Urology, 12(1), 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2013.11.001

Tanganelli, G., Cassano, L., Miele, A., & Vallati, C. (2020). A Methodology for the Design and Deployment of Distributed Cyber-Physical Systems for Smart Environments. Future Generation Computer Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2020.02.047

Törngren, M., Grimheden, M. E., Gustafsson, J., & Birk, W. (2016). Strategies and considerations in shaping Cyber-Physical Systems education. ACM SIGBED Review, 14(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2829957.2829965

Tvenge, N., & Martinsen, K. (2018). Integration of digital learning in industrial 4.0. Procedia Manufacturing, 23(2017), 261–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.04.027

Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, June 2017, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2019.01.001

Uhlemann, T. H. J., Lehmann, C., & Steinhilper, R. (2017). The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industrial 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 61, 335–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152

Wahab, N. A., & Mustapha, R. (2015). Reflections on Pedagogical and Curriculum Implementation at Orang Asli Schools in Pahang. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 442–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.376

Wilson, J. A., Pegram, A. H., Battise, D. M., & Robinson, A. M. (2017). Traditional Lecture Versus Jigsaw Learning Method For Teaching Medication Therapy Management (MTM) Core Elements. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(6), 1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.028

Zevin, B., Sheahan, G., Ashamalla, S., Dedy, N. J., Jalink, D., & Grantcharov, T. (2019). Implementation and Evaluation of a Comprehensive Proficiency-Based Curriculum in an Advanced, Minimally Invasive Procedure: A Multi-Institutional Canadian Experience. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 15(11), 1956–1964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.053

Zezulka, F., Marcon, P., Vesely, I., & Sajdl, O. (2016). Industrial 4.0 – An Introduction in the phenomenon. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(25). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.12.002

Zhong, R. Y., Xu, X., Klotz, E., & Newman, S. T. (2017). Intelligent Manufacturing in the Context of Industrial 4.0: A Review. Engineering, 3(5), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.015

Zhou, K., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2016). Industrial 4.0: Towards future industrial opportunities and challenges. 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, FSKD 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/FSKD.2015.7382284

Downloads

Published

2022-04-11

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): April

Section

Articles

License

In submitting the manuscript to the journal, the authors certify that:

  1. Authors are authorized by their co-authors to enter into these arrangements.
  2. The work described has not been formally published before, except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture, review, thesis, or overlay journal. Please also carefully read Publication Ethics
  3. That it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere,
  4. That its publication has been approved by all the author(s) and by the responsible authorities – tacitly or explicitly – of the institutes where the work has been carried out.
  5. Authors secure the right to reproduce any material that has already been published or copyrighted elsewhere.
  6. Authors agree to the following copyright agreement.

Authors who publish with IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.