Speech Function Analysis in Online Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v10i2.5633Keywords:
Speech Function, Classification of Speech Function, Online classroomAbstract
The pandemic of Covid-19 has had an impact on education. Because of the presence of the corona virus, face-to-face teaching-learning activities have been hampered. One of them is the use of an online classroom in which teachers or lecturers engage verbally with students. The examination of speech function can reveal verbal interaction. The purpose of this research is to look at Speech Function in online Structure and Speaking programs. This study looks into: 1) speech function classification in online Structure and Speaking classes; 2) how speech function is implemented in online Structure and Speaking classes; and 3) why speech function is implemented in online Structure and Speaking classes.   The data for this study was gathered through qualitative research from the discourse of lecturers and students in online Structure and Speaking classes. Content analysis and Speech Function analysis were used to examine the data. The speech function can be used to evaluate 32 utterances in the Structure online classroom.  Statement has 56.3 percent, Question has 34.3 percent, Offer has 3.1 percent, and Command has 6.3 percent, according to the Structure class statistics. The data from the first question of the speech function of statement in the online speaking class is 100 percent accurate. It is because the inquiry is a form of experience-based self-opinion, and many claims require data to reinforce their answers. The second question is statement (67.8%), with command coming in second at 30.3%.
References
Rezeki, T. I. (2018). “Kontekstual Code Switching Dalam Seminar Proposal Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggrisâ€. Jurnal Serunai Bahasa Inggris, 10(2), 1-7.
Sagala, R. W., & Rezeki, T. I. (2018). “Grammtical Code Switching in the English Department Proposal Seminarâ€. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal)(1), 11-14.
Saragih, A. 2011. “Semiotika Bahasa. Tanda, Penanda dan Petanda dalam Bahasaâ€. Medan: Pascasarjana Unimed Pers.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. 1994. “An Introduction to Functional Grammarâ€. London: Edward Arnold.
Arifuudin and Sofwan. 2015. “Speech Functions And Grammatical Patterns Realization In Conversation In The English Textbookâ€. Semarang State University Indonesia.
Wiyanto. 2020. “Using Speech Function On Efl Classroomâ€. Journal of English Teaching and Research.
Batubara. 2020. “The dominant speech functions in cigarette billboard textsâ€. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(2), 177-189.
Rezeki, T. I. (2020). “Textual Function in English Morphology Online Classroomâ€. English Teaching and Linguistics Journal, 1(2), 44-48.
Sugiyono. 2016. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&Dâ€. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Hamidi. 2004. “Metode Penelitian Kualitatifâ€. Malang: UMM Press
Sugiyono. 2009. “Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kualitatifâ€.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. “Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktikâ€. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta
Indari, Ayu. 2011. “Realization of Speech Function in Mood in The Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono’s (SBY) Speechesâ€. Thesis unpublished. Medan: Postgraduate School State University of Medan.
Holmes, Janet. 1992. “An Introduction to Sociolinguisticsâ€. London and New York: Longman.
Rezeki, T. I., & Sagala, R. W. (2019). “Pemerolehan Bahasa Anak Periode Linguistikâ€. Jurnal Artikula, 2(2), 1-7.
